| Author |
Message
|
| Remco |
 Posted: Wed Jan 15, 2003 8:28 am Post subject: Version 2 Client available ??? (RESOLVED) |
 |
|
Acolyte
Joined: 19 Mar 2002
Posts: 68
Location: Capelle aan den IJssel (Rotterdam)
|
Hi,
I'm wondering if there is a version 2 client available for windows ??? And if so, could someone provide with it. I can't find it on the IBM site.
Thanks....
Last edited by Remco on Thu Jan 16, 2003 11:54 pm; edited 1 time in total |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
| bower5932 |
| Posted: Wed Jan 15, 2003 9:30 am Post subject: |
|
|
Jedi Knight
Joined: 27 Aug 2001
Posts: 3023
Location: Dallas, TX, USA
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
| Remco |
| Posted: Thu Jan 16, 2003 12:29 am Post subject: |
|
|
Acolyte
Joined: 19 Mar 2002
Posts: 68
Location: Capelle aan den IJssel (Rotterdam)
|
| NO, I really mean Version 2. The QueueManagers on our OS390 system are version 2.1. And I'm having some problems working with a version 5 client. Problem that do not exist when I have my client connect to a MQServer Version 5 on a Windows machine. |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
| dgolding |
| Posted: Thu Jan 16, 2003 1:21 am Post subject: |
|
|
Yatiri
Joined: 16 May 2001
Posts: 668
Location: Switzerland
|
MVS Version 2.1 had it's own numbering system - it doesn't relate to the "open systems" numbering - it's not the same as version 2 on Windows NT, for instance.
AFAIK, client support is a "seperately-priced" feature on MVS. Do you have the client facility enabled? Look at the output log for the xxxxCHIN job, and see if it says CAF (Client Attachment Feature) is enabled.
If not, then it's time to spend money with IBM I'm afraid  |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
| Remco |
| Posted: Thu Jan 16, 2003 1:27 am Post subject: |
|
|
Acolyte
Joined: 19 Mar 2002
Posts: 68
Location: Capelle aan den IJssel (Rotterdam)
|
| No no, this facillity is installed and working correctly. It is just that during development of a new app. I'm having some problems doing firts a get, and then a put. This results in a reason code 2009. If I'm testing this app aginst V5.2.1 server on win2000 no problem exists. |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
| mrlinux |
| Posted: Thu Jan 16, 2003 4:51 am Post subject: |
|
|
Grand Master
Joined: 14 Feb 2002
Posts: 1261
Location: Detroit,MI USA
|
How are you setting the client to point to the OS/390 env variables ????
_________________
Jeff
IBM Certified Developer MQSeries
IBM Certified Specialist MQSeries
IBM Certified Solutions Expert MQSeries |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
| Remco |
| Posted: Thu Jan 16, 2003 5:08 am Post subject: |
|
|
Acolyte
Joined: 19 Mar 2002
Posts: 68
Location: Capelle aan den IJssel (Rotterdam)
|
| Using the Amqclchl.tab file.... only one queue manager and channel are in it.... |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
| oz1ccg |
| Posted: Thu Jan 16, 2003 5:53 am Post subject: |
|
|
Yatiri
Joined: 10 Feb 2002
Posts: 628
Location: Denmark
|
This is not first time with CLients and MQS 2.1 for OS/390.
I've still got a version 5.0 client for Windows/NT which also works fine under windows/2000. If interested drop me a mail/message.
Just my $0.02 
_________________
Regards, Jørgen
Home of BlockIP2, the last free MQ Security exit ver. 3.00
Cert. on WMQ, WBIMB, SWIFT. |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
| Remco |
| Posted: Thu Jan 16, 2003 11:52 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Acolyte
Joined: 19 Mar 2002
Posts: 68
Location: Capelle aan den IJssel (Rotterdam)
|
Thanks for the idea's people......
But I've figured out why it went wrong.... For some (desparate) reason I tried the code on another client machine. On this machine there were no problems at all. So I started wondering what the difference between tose machines could be.
The difference was :
On the machine returning reason code 2009 I had installed the client using the Server CDRom. On the other machine I installed the client using the client CDRom. So on my workstation (which was returning 2009) deinstalled client, and reinstalled client using te Client CDRom. All go's well now.
Did anybody ever notice there is a difference between those two client installation. Both version number I'm using is V5.2.1.
In my opinion this is a problem which should be reported to IBM. But I'm wondering if there are people who disagree.
Remco |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
| mrlinux |
| Posted: Fri Jan 17, 2003 5:08 am Post subject: |
|
|
Grand Master
Joined: 14 Feb 2002
Posts: 1261
Location: Detroit,MI USA
|
Well if you read the manual it states that if you want client with server then use the server CD otherwise use client.
_________________
Jeff
IBM Certified Developer MQSeries
IBM Certified Specialist MQSeries
IBM Certified Solutions Expert MQSeries |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
| Remco |
| Posted: Fri Jan 17, 2003 6:15 am Post subject: |
|
|
Acolyte
Joined: 19 Mar 2002
Posts: 68
Location: Capelle aan den IJssel (Rotterdam)
|
| That's true.... On my workstation I had server running, that's why I used the server CD to Install client. But this results in the problem. |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
| mrlinux |
| Posted: Fri Jan 17, 2003 7:16 am Post subject: |
|
|
Grand Master
Joined: 14 Feb 2002
Posts: 1261
Location: Detroit,MI USA
|
Are you saying you had MQ Server running and then installed the Server
Client version and it failed, that it should not do.
_________________
Jeff
IBM Certified Developer MQSeries
IBM Certified Specialist MQSeries
IBM Certified Solutions Expert MQSeries |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
| Remco |
| Posted: Fri Jan 17, 2003 7:47 am Post subject: |
|
|
Acolyte
Joined: 19 Mar 2002
Posts: 68
Location: Capelle aan den IJssel (Rotterdam)
|
That's exectly what I'm saying.......
I suggest someone sle to trie it, before I report it. |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
|
|
