| Author |
Message
|
| lium |
 Posted: Mon Jul 20, 2015 5:34 am Post subject: maximum message size on shared queue |
 |
|
Disciple
Joined: 17 Jul 2002
Posts: 184
|
As far as I know, on MQ version 5, the maximum message size to shared queue is 63K.
I am wondering if the limitation is still there for version 7
Thanks |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
| Vitor |
| Posted: Mon Jul 20, 2015 5:40 am Post subject: |
|
|
Grand High Poobah
Joined: 11 Nov 2005
Posts: 26093
Location: Texas, USA
|
Moved to Mainframe forum
_________________
Honesty is the best policy.
Insanity is the best defence. |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
| exerk |
| Posted: Mon Jul 20, 2015 5:45 am Post subject: |
|
|
Jedi Council
Joined: 02 Nov 2006
Posts: 6339
|
Have a look in the V7.x KCs - all the information regarding how shared queue messages are stored, at that version, is there.
_________________
It's puzzling, I don't think I've ever seen anything quite like this before...and it's hard to soar like an eagle when you're surrounded by turkeys. |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
| lium |
| Posted: Mon Jul 20, 2015 5:59 am Post subject: |
|
|
Disciple
Joined: 17 Jul 2002
Posts: 184
|
Thanks, Could you please kindly share the link?
I am new to mainframe MQ |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
| exerk |
| Posted: Mon Jul 20, 2015 6:22 am Post subject: |
|
|
Jedi Council
Joined: 02 Nov 2006
Posts: 6339
|
| lium wrote: |
| Thanks, Could you please kindly share the link? |
It's all in the same KCs, so if you're familiar with distributed you'll know where to find them...
| lium wrote: |
| I am new to mainframe MQ |
...who isn't these days? 
_________________
It's puzzling, I don't think I've ever seen anything quite like this before...and it's hard to soar like an eagle when you're surrounded by turkeys. |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
| lium |
| Posted: Mon Jul 20, 2015 6:28 am Post subject: |
|
|
Disciple
Joined: 17 Jul 2002
Posts: 184
|
Thanks,
I already checked that.
My understanding is:
For under 63K, it is stored inside the Coupling Facility, for above that, stored in BLOB,
So generally speaking, there is NO such limitation any more.
Could you please confirm my understanding is correct or not?
Thanks |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
| exerk |
| Posted: Mon Jul 20, 2015 6:31 am Post subject: |
|
|
Jedi Council
Joined: 02 Nov 2006
Posts: 6339
|
| lium wrote: |
| ...Could you please confirm my understanding is correct or not?... |
And you'd trust the word of a complete stranger on the interweb thingy over the chapter-and-verse of the KC? 
_________________
It's puzzling, I don't think I've ever seen anything quite like this before...and it's hard to soar like an eagle when you're surrounded by turkeys. |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
| elkinsc |
| Posted: Thu Aug 06, 2015 8:54 am Post subject: How messages > 63K are stored |
|
|
Centurion
Joined: 29 Dec 2004
Posts: 138
Location: Indy
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
| lium |
| Posted: Sun Aug 09, 2015 7:51 am Post subject: |
|
|
Disciple
Joined: 17 Jul 2002
Posts: 184
|
Thanks a lot for the reply.
I asked the question when I was on the entrance.
Right now, I realized this limitation only applied to the old version. There is no such block with version 7 or above. |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
| bruce2359 |
| Posted: Sun Aug 09, 2015 10:00 am Post subject: |
|
|
Poobah
Joined: 05 Jan 2008
Posts: 9469
Location: US: west coast, almost. Otherwise, enroute.
|
The old 'limitation' was imposed by real-storage constraints of the CF hardware. A CF is not a virtual-storage box.
_________________
I like deadlines. I like to wave as they pass by.
ב''ה
Lex Orandi, Lex Credendi, Lex Vivendi. As we Worship, So we Believe, So we Live. |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
|
|
