|
RSS Feed - WebSphere MQ Support
|
RSS Feed - Message Broker Support
|
 |
|
Problem using MQGET and MQPUT same Queue (isereis / AS/400 / |
« View previous topic :: View next topic » |
Author |
Message
|
ANJUMK |
Posted: Tue Feb 24, 2015 12:17 am Post subject: Problem using MQGET and MQPUT same Queue (isereis / AS/400 / |
|
|
Newbie
Joined: 20 Oct 2014 Posts: 4
|
Dear Friends,
I have'nt code program which read and put the message form/to same queue. (Server program)
The requirnment is that client will send the request message in Queue A, and Server need to read message from Queue A and response to Queue A.
The logic i am looking is to filter incomming messages and ignore the response message with is lying the Queue A.
I have tried below mention guideline in MQSeries document, but it is reading all messages incomming as well response.
GMMO (10-digit signed integer)
Options controlling selection criteria used for MQGET" with various option,
MOMSGI
MOCORI
MOGRPI.
Please help me to solve this, and if possible help me to identify sample from to be used for the above requirnment from QMQMSAMP/QRPGLESRC so i can uitilize that.
Thanks in Advance.
Regards |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
zpat |
Posted: Tue Feb 24, 2015 12:27 am Post subject: |
|
|
 Jedi Council
Joined: 19 May 2001 Posts: 5866 Location: UK
|
Don't do this. A good request - reply model is as follows.
Requestors put request messages into queue A
Server unconditionally gets request messages one at a time from queue A.
Server puts each reply into queue B (copying the incoming msgid to the outgoing correlid field in the reply message).
Requestors(s) get from queue B - matching their response on the correlid (which they know because they can take it from the put message msgid).
This way, one pair of queues can service any number of requestors at the same time.
Alternatively the server can use the incoming message's reply-to-q value to decide what queue to use for the reply message. This is useful if you want to use dynamic reply queues for example (to avoid having to match the response). However opening queues like this each time can be less efficient.
The server (and requestor) should aim to keep their queues open all the time rather than open and close them for each message.
The server should listen on the queue with MQGET MQGMO_WAIT to avoid any need to poll the queue. _________________ Well, I don't think there is any question about it. It can only be attributable to human error. This sort of thing has cropped up before, and it has always been due to human error. |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
ANJUMK |
Posted: Tue Feb 24, 2015 2:40 am Post subject: |
|
|
Newbie
Joined: 20 Oct 2014 Posts: 4
|
Hi Jedi Knight,
Thank you for advice, i also prefer what you have said, but vendor is instisting on 1 Queue model.
Anyways i am convincing him for 2 Queue model.
Thanks again
Regards |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
PaulClarke |
Posted: Tue Feb 24, 2015 2:54 am Post subject: |
|
|
 Grand Master
Joined: 17 Nov 2005 Posts: 1002 Location: New Zealand
|
Did the vendor say why they needed it to be a single queue. It sounds like someone has come up with a solution for a problem and there may be other, better solutions.
It is possible to use the same queue for the request and the reply but, like zpat says, it's not really a good idea.
Cheers,
Paul. _________________ Paul Clarke
MQGem Software
www.mqgem.com |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
|
|
 |
|
Page 1 of 1 |
|
You cannot post new topics in this forum You cannot reply to topics in this forum You cannot edit your posts in this forum You cannot delete your posts in this forum You cannot vote in polls in this forum
|
|
|
|