| Author |
Message
|
| anurag.munjal |
 Posted: Wed Feb 20, 2013 10:39 pm Post subject: MRM full form? |
 |
|
Voyager
Joined: 08 Apr 2012
Posts: 97
|
ok, am really feeling embarresed by asking this, but i am out of options!
MRM full form please??
 |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
| smdavies99 |
| Posted: Wed Feb 20, 2013 11:16 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Jedi Council
Joined: 10 Feb 2003
Posts: 6076
Location: Somewhere over the Rainbow this side of Never-never land.
|
What are you really asking for?
IMHO, your question is not really clear enough. It might mean something to you but to the rest of us? probably not.
If you are using V8 then you shoulf be using DFDL anyway.
Please give us some more details and then we might be able to help you
_________________
WMQ User since 1999
MQSI/WBI/WMB/'Thingy' User since 2002
Linux user since 1995
Every time you reinvent the wheel the more square it gets (anon). If in doubt think and investigate before you ask silly questions. |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
| kimbert |
| Posted: Thu Feb 21, 2013 3:35 am Post subject: |
|
|
Jedi Council
Joined: 29 Jul 2003
Posts: 5542
Location: Southampton
|
| Quote: |
| MRM full form please?? |
What does that mean? Is it a question? |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
| anurag.munjal |
| Posted: Thu Feb 21, 2013 3:42 am Post subject: MRM Full Form? |
|
|
Voyager
Joined: 08 Apr 2012
Posts: 97
|
Ok, apologies for not making the question clear.
like SOAP stands for Simple object access protocol, xml stand for Extensible Markup Language, what does the domain MRM stands for. i use this parser all the time for dealing with CWF data, but is the full form of MRM?
i hope am clister clear in my question! 
Thank you! |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
| anurag.munjal |
| Posted: Thu Feb 21, 2013 3:45 am Post subject: |
|
|
Voyager
Joined: 08 Apr 2012
Posts: 97
|
also, esql stands for Extended structured query language. (i guess) 
Thursday is my full forms day you see!  |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
| mb_zest |
| Posted: Thu Feb 21, 2013 3:56 am Post subject: |
|
|
Novice
Joined: 06 Feb 2013
Posts: 16
|
| U can google that buddy.. any way MRM Stands for Message Repository Manager.. |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
| JosephBCT |
| Posted: Thu Feb 21, 2013 4:04 am Post subject: |
|
|
Novice
Joined: 07 Feb 2013
Posts: 23
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
| kimbert |
| Posted: Thu Feb 21, 2013 4:06 am Post subject: |
|
|
Jedi Council
Joined: 29 Jul 2003
Posts: 5542
Location: Southampton
|
| Quote: |
| MRM Stands for Message Repository Manager |
Not true these days. 'MRM' is not officially an acronym any more. It's just a name for a set of message modelling/parsing/writing facilities in v5/v6/v7. And in v8, but DFDL is far easier to use and more strategic.
In the food industry, 'MRM' stands for 'Mechanically Recovered Meat'. Mmmm, nice!
Last edited by kimbert on Thu Feb 21, 2013 4:14 am; edited 1 time in total |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
| anurag.munjal |
| Posted: Thu Feb 21, 2013 4:10 am Post subject: |
|
|
Voyager
Joined: 08 Apr 2012
Posts: 97
|
oh yes! gotcha...
Thanks a ton Team!
Cheers!  |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
| mb_zest |
| Posted: Thu Feb 21, 2013 4:32 am Post subject: |
|
|
Novice
Joined: 06 Feb 2013
Posts: 16
|
@kimbert Ohh yes u r true 
@anurag.munjal you have to know by now that our questions must be much more precise & clear so that the any one can help us easily  |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
| mqjeff |
| Posted: Thu Feb 21, 2013 5:08 am Post subject: |
|
|
Grand Master
Joined: 25 Jun 2008
Posts: 17447
|
SOAP does not stand for simple object access protocol.
It stands for SOAP. |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
| akkypaul |
| Posted: Sun Feb 22, 2015 3:35 am Post subject: |
|
|
Apprentice
Joined: 30 Jun 2014
Posts: 44
Location: India
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
| Simbu |
| Posted: Sun Feb 22, 2015 10:22 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Master
Joined: 17 Jun 2011
Posts: 289
Location: Tamil Nadu, India
|
| Quote: |
| SOAP originally stood for "Simple Object Access Protocol" but version 1.2 of the standard dropped this acronym |
. |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
| smdavies99 |
| Posted: Sun Feb 22, 2015 10:39 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Jedi Council
Joined: 10 Feb 2003
Posts: 6076
Location: Somewhere over the Rainbow this side of Never-never land.
|
and the 'S' does not always means Simple. Some of the WSDL's I've had to deal with are just stupidly complex.
One client wanted to standardise on one WSDL for their whole system. When it go to 50+ requests and replies they finally agreed that it was a bit silly.
I don't mind SOAP because at least you have a schema to validate the incoming message against. If it fails then the requestor can have no complaints when you send a reject back. GIGO and all that.
_________________
WMQ User since 1999
MQSI/WBI/WMB/'Thingy' User since 2002
Linux user since 1995
Every time you reinvent the wheel the more square it gets (anon). If in doubt think and investigate before you ask silly questions. |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
|
|
