Are there any pros or cons in standard MQ security v Channel Authentication Records? We've beent thinking about starting to implement authentication records.
CHLAUTH records are an additional set of controls that apply specifically to channels. They let you control what happens when someone connects to a queue manager over a channel.
So they sit on top of normal mq security, and add additional features.
Likewise, the user authorization in v8 sits on top of both chlauth and regular MQ security.
Joined: 11 Nov 2005 Posts: 26093 Location: Texas, USA
hammer76 wrote:
Are there any pros or cons in standard MQ security v Channel Authentication Records? We've beent thinking about starting to implement authentication records.
The question makes no sense. Channel Authority records add additional features to MQ Security, allow more granular control of MQ Security and are just good things. They don't replace the "standard" MQ security of queue authorities, MCA Users and all the old familar constructs but work in conjunction with them.
As a simple example, channel authority records allow many more options to set the user id supplied to the OAM than available in v7.0. _________________ Honesty is the best policy.
Insanity is the best defence.
You cannot post new topics in this forum You cannot reply to topics in this forum You cannot edit your posts in this forum You cannot delete your posts in this forum You cannot vote in polls in this forum