Author |
Message
|
hotrock026 |
Posted: Thu Sep 04, 2014 5:29 am Post subject: Issue with the Group Reload |
|
|
Apprentice
Joined: 23 Feb 2014 Posts: 38
|
Can anyone help me with the below error
When ever i reload an group iam getting the below error and finally it forces us to restart the broker...
4 16:17:34 web1test WebSphere Broker v7003[12096]: (SAMPLEBROKER)[69]BIP2057E: Execution Group Group02 could not be started: broker name SAMPLEBROKER; UUID f1968407-3601-0000-0080-c01b505fa157; label Group02; Pub-Sub server {4} (1=Yes, 0=No). : SAMPLEBROKER.agent: /build/S700_P/src/AdminAgent/ImbAdminAgent.cpp: 4988: ImbAdminAgent::startAndMonitorADataFlowEngine: : _________________ Think Better & Think Smart then others |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
Vitor |
Posted: Thu Sep 04, 2014 5:39 am Post subject: |
|
|
 Grand High Poobah
Joined: 11 Nov 2005 Posts: 26093 Location: Texas, USA
|
What's deployed to that execution group?
Have you considered moving from v7.0.0.3 to a more fixed version? _________________ Honesty is the best policy.
Insanity is the best defence. |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
hotrock026 |
Posted: Thu Sep 04, 2014 5:55 am Post subject: Issue with the Group Reload |
|
|
Apprentice
Joined: 23 Feb 2014 Posts: 38
|
Hi vitor,
thanks for ur reply, we are using 7.0.0.3 vers, only normal flows have been deployed this issue we are getting recently, before it was working fine...
Only one flow is deployed in the group... _________________ Think Better & Think Smart then others |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
Vitor |
Posted: Thu Sep 04, 2014 6:08 am Post subject: Re: Issue with the Group Reload |
|
|
 Grand High Poobah
Joined: 11 Nov 2005 Posts: 26093 Location: Texas, USA
|
hotrock026 wrote: |
before it was working fine... |
So the question is - before what? What changed? New version of the single flow? Maintenance of the OS? What?
This is also interesting:
hotrock026 wrote: |
When ever i reload an group |
What prompts you to reload the execution group? You shouldn't need to unless you're changing something, and something that's outside the scope of a deploy. _________________ Honesty is the best policy.
Insanity is the best defence. |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
hotrock026 |
Posted: Thu Sep 04, 2014 7:09 am Post subject: |
|
|
Apprentice
Joined: 23 Feb 2014 Posts: 38
|
HI Vitor,
Their was an change in the flow , so i had changed in the mapping level and re deployed the flow , and it got deployed succesfully , we have some properties which are in the Cachea which i have changed one of the property and to update the new value i have reloaded the group , then the group trows the below error...
before means before deploying the latest change
One more important ino:
In the development environment we are using the Ver 7.0.07
where we are facing this issue only in the UAT environment..
this broker hold 50 groups .... _________________ Think Better & Think Smart then others |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
Vitor |
Posted: Thu Sep 04, 2014 7:16 am Post subject: |
|
|
 Grand High Poobah
Joined: 11 Nov 2005 Posts: 26093 Location: Texas, USA
|
hotrock026 wrote: |
we have some properties which are in the Cachea which i have changed one of the property |
What cache? v7 doesn't have a cache built in so what's this?
before means before deploying the latest change
hotrock026 wrote: |
One more important ino:
In the development environment we are using the Ver 7.0.07
where we are facing this issue only in the UAT environment.. |
And as I said:
Vitor wrote: |
Have you considered moving from v7.0.0.3 to a more fixed version? |
So clearly you should certainly consider it. _________________ Honesty is the best policy.
Insanity is the best defence. |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
hotrock026 |
Posted: Sat Sep 06, 2014 10:34 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Apprentice
Joined: 23 Feb 2014 Posts: 38
|
Hi vitor,
their are some properties whcih we are keeping it in the database and those values we are maintaing in the cachea level...instead of hiting every time database ,
Could you please breif the issue.... _________________ Think Better & Think Smart then others |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
Vitor |
Posted: Mon Sep 08, 2014 5:07 am Post subject: |
|
|
 Grand High Poobah
Joined: 11 Nov 2005 Posts: 26093 Location: Texas, USA
|
hotrock026 wrote: |
their are some properties whcih we are keeping it in the database and those values we are maintaing in the cachea level...instead of hiting every time database |
It's a cheap solution to just reload the execution group. It's easy enough to make the code which loads the cache detect that the database contents have changed.
hotrock026 wrote: |
Could you please breif the issue.... |
Once again, if this works in your development environment using WMBv7.0.0.7 and not with v7.0.0.3 then you need to upgrade. You shouldn't still be using v7.0.0.3 irrespective of this issue. _________________ Honesty is the best policy.
Insanity is the best defence. |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
hotrock026 |
Posted: Tue Sep 09, 2014 1:55 am Post subject: |
|
|
Apprentice
Joined: 23 Feb 2014 Posts: 38
|
Hi vitor,
Even our code supports to handle the cache properties for every 12 hours...
if we need an imediate changes then their is no other way only reloading the group....
Thanks for that ..
but in the development we doesnt have 45 groups but in the test environment we have 45 groups... _________________ Think Better & Think Smart then others |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
Vitor |
Posted: Tue Sep 09, 2014 4:41 am Post subject: |
|
|
 Grand High Poobah
Joined: 11 Nov 2005 Posts: 26093 Location: Texas, USA
|
hotrock026 wrote: |
if we need an imediate changes then their is no other way only reloading the group.... |
Rubbish. If your code can handle reloading the cache every 12 hours it can handle reloading the cache on demand.
hotrock026 wrote: |
but in the development we doesnt have 45 groups but in the test environment we have 45 groups... |
a) So what?
b) If you think that invalidates my assertion you should upgrade, why do you think that?
c) That's a good reason to have your code reload the cache rather than issue 45 mqsireload commands. _________________ Honesty is the best policy.
Insanity is the best defence. |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
|