| Author |
Message
|
| MQ_user1 |
 Posted: Thu Jul 10, 2014 3:14 am Post subject: Integration Toolkit |
 |
|
Novice
Joined: 09 Jun 2010
Posts: 19
|
We have Integration Bus v9/Message Broker Installed on Solaris server by xxx consultant.
I have Installed Integration toolkit v9 on my development Windows workstation.
Created a connection to Remote Broker with properties Queue Manager/Host/Port.
But when trying to connect to Remote Broker but getting MQRC 2035....
Please help.
Thanks
Araj |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
| MQ_user1 |
| Posted: Thu Jul 10, 2014 3:21 am Post subject: |
|
|
Novice
Joined: 09 Jun 2010
Posts: 19
|
The default values for the new features for MQ version 7.1 + is CHLAUTH is ENABLED.
So, we have to map the Toolkit user to the user on unix server and that Unix user must be in mqm and mqbrkrs group.
I can now be able to connect to remote broker using Integration Toolkit.
Reference : http://www-01.ibm.com/support/docview.wss?uid=swg21577137
Thanks
ARaj |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
| Vitor |
| Posted: Thu Jul 10, 2014 4:27 am Post subject: |
|
|
Grand High Poobah
Joined: 11 Nov 2005
Posts: 26093
Location: Texas, USA
|
| MQ_user1 wrote: |
| So, we have to map the Toolkit user to the user on unix server and that Unix user must be in mqm and mqbrkrs group. |
Which as the link you posted indicates is fine for a test set up, less so for more secure environments.
Not to dis your solution; just to clarify for future readers it's not an entirely appropriate solution for all environments.
_________________
Honesty is the best policy.
Insanity is the best defence. |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
| MQ_user1 |
| Posted: Thu Jul 10, 2014 4:30 am Post subject: |
|
|
Novice
Joined: 09 Jun 2010
Posts: 19
|
Yes Vitor, I agree.
We are going to have SSL Channel security on top of it.
Anything else from your side please? |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
| Vitor |
| Posted: Thu Jul 10, 2014 4:37 am Post subject: |
|
|
Grand High Poobah
Joined: 11 Nov 2005
Posts: 26093
Location: Texas, USA
|
| MQ_user1 wrote: |
| We are going to have SSL Channel security on top of it. |
Always a smart idea 
| MQ_user1 wrote: |
| Anything else from your side please? |
I feel I've met my goal of warning less experienced members of future generations that membership of the administrative groups is not always desireable. We could break into a long discussion on why you should never connect a Toolkit to a non-Dev environment and the glory of an automated code management solution that eliminates human interaction, but that's way off topic.
_________________
Honesty is the best policy.
Insanity is the best defence. |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
|
|
