| Author |
Message
|
| ppraveen33 |
 Posted: Wed Jun 25, 2014 6:56 am Post subject: Message Set Issue |
 |
|
Apprentice
Joined: 26 Jun 2013
Posts: 36
|
1/hdr/1/LTD/ETC
1/dtl/54278/CONSUMER LTD/CTC
1/dtl/67892/CONSUMER LTD/CTC
1/dtl/67392/CONSUMER LTD/CTC
2/hdr/2/VERIZON LTD/ETC
2/dtl/78956/PRODUCER LTD/CTC
2/dtl/34567/PRODUCER LTD/CTC
2/dtl/56783/PRODUCER LTD/CTC
2/dtl/87652/PRODUCER LTD/CTC
My Input data , can any one guide me on this how to construct a message set to parse the message?? how to check hdr and dtl tag in the record?? |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
| kimbert |
| Posted: Thu Jun 26, 2014 3:23 am Post subject: |
|
|
Jedi Council
Joined: 29 Jul 2003
Posts: 5542
Location: Southampton
|
Which version of WMB / IIB?
What have you tried? What happened? ( please quote any error messages )
_________________
Before you criticize someone, walk a mile in their shoes. That way you're a mile away, and you have their shoes too. |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
| ppraveen33 |
| Posted: Fri Jun 27, 2014 12:56 am Post subject: |
|
|
Apprentice
Joined: 26 Jun 2013
Posts: 36
|
HI
I am using IIB9(9.0.0.1)
I have parsed this message using DFDL. For hdr and dtl elements I have set the discriminator property and parsed the message, worked fine. But i need to parse this message using message sets. So how to validate hdr and dtl elements in the input data.
Thanks in advance.. |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
| smdavies99 |
| Posted: Fri Jun 27, 2014 1:10 am Post subject: |
|
|
Jedi Council
Joined: 10 Feb 2003
Posts: 6076
Location: Somewhere over the Rainbow this side of Never-never land.
|
| ppraveen33 wrote: |
HI
But i need to parse this message using message sets
|
Why? If I read your post right then you have it working with DFDL.
Message Sets are the old way of doing it. Yes you can use them but you should be using DFDL these days (says he having just finished updating a CSV message set for an old project)
_________________
WMQ User since 1999
MQSI/WBI/WMB/'Thingy' User since 2002
Linux user since 1995
Every time you reinvent the wheel the more square it gets (anon). If in doubt think and investigate before you ask silly questions. |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
| ppraveen33 |
| Posted: Fri Jun 27, 2014 5:20 am Post subject: |
|
|
Apprentice
Joined: 26 Jun 2013
Posts: 36
|
HI davies,
My question is do we have any thing in parsing the input message using message sets by constructing message definition?? is there any possibility in achieving this?? I just want to know.. Thanks for ya reply. |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
| mqjeff |
| Posted: Fri Jun 27, 2014 5:30 am Post subject: |
|
|
Grand Master
Joined: 25 Jun 2008
Posts: 17447
|
Yes, you can construct a DFDL schema to model your message.
You can then use this to parse your message at runtime.
It's not a "message set". it's not a "message model". It's DFDL schema.
There's nothing apparently tricky about your message. It should be a straight forward exercise in using the DFDL tooling to create and test a model.
Best of luck! |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
| kimbert |
| Posted: Fri Jun 27, 2014 1:42 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Jedi Council
Joined: 29 Jul 2003
Posts: 5542
Location: Southampton
|
Like mqjeff and smdavies99, I am very puzzled. If you have a working DFDL schema then I do not understand why you would want to create a message set. The DFDL domain can replace the MRM domain in your message flow.
So you need to explain, very clearly, what you are trying to do. Remember that words like 'parse' and 'validate' and 'message' mean different things to different readers. Please state your problem using an example input message and expected outputs.
_________________
Before you criticize someone, walk a mile in their shoes. That way you're a mile away, and you have their shoes too. |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
|
|
