Joined: 10 Feb 2003 Posts: 6076 Location: Somewhere over the Rainbow this side of Never-never land.
PeterPotkay wrote:
In cases like that what we do is have only one instance of the output queue and we cluster it so other QMs can see it. The consuming app then has their one and only instance consume from that one output queue. And everyone has to be aware that if that QM becomes N/A, the output messages will queue up onthe System Cluster Transmit Queue of the other QMs int he cluster.
I'd probably prefer to have a gateway QM in an Active/Passive setup that way there is no chance of any message interruption however that sort of defeats the use of an Active-Active setup in the first place. _________________ WMQ User since 1999
MQSI/WBI/WMB/'Thingy' User since 2002
Linux user since 1995
Every time you reinvent the wheel the more square it gets (anon). If in doubt think and investigate before you ask silly questions.
You cannot post new topics in this forum You cannot reply to topics in this forum You cannot edit your posts in this forum You cannot delete your posts in this forum You cannot vote in polls in this forum