| Author |
Message
|
| w1ndy |
 Posted: Tue Apr 23, 2013 11:44 pm Post subject: WMQ 7.5 and Falcon |
 |
|
Apprentice
Joined: 19 Jan 2011
Posts: 38
|
Good morning chums.
Has anyone got any experience of using WMQ 7.5 with the fraud tool Falcon. Have you had any issues with WMQ 7.5 and they way Falcon uses MQ?
Anything shared would be braw
Thanks
Windy |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
| mqjeff |
| Posted: Wed Apr 24, 2013 3:43 am Post subject: |
|
|
Grand Master
Joined: 25 Jun 2008
Posts: 17447
|
... This is kind of like that question about using a virus checker against MQ.
What are you trying to protect, here? |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
| w1ndy |
| Posted: Wed Apr 24, 2013 3:46 am Post subject: Mmmmm |
|
|
Apprentice
Joined: 19 Jan 2011
Posts: 38
|
not sure what you are on about mqjeff.
Windy |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
| mqjeff |
| Posted: Wed Apr 24, 2013 3:49 am Post subject: Re: Mmmmm |
|
|
Grand Master
Joined: 25 Jun 2008
Posts: 17447
|
| w1ndy wrote: |
not sure what you are on about mqjeff.
Windy |
Well, we're even then. I'm not sure what you are trying to accomplish by executing a fraud checker against MQ.
What kinds of fraud are you expecting to receive over MQ? What kinds of fraud are you expecting MQ to perpetrate on the behalf of other people?
I simply do not understand the purpose you are trying to achieve, by combining these two pieces of software, because I do not understand any reason why these two pieces of software would need, in any way, to be combined? |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
| w1ndy |
| Posted: Wed Apr 24, 2013 3:53 am Post subject: Ahhhhhhhhhh, well here goes |
|
|
Apprentice
Joined: 19 Jan 2011
Posts: 38
|
Payment info arrives from Wincor, is processed by an app which puts messages on a queues which Falcon reads, establishes if the transaction is potentially fraudulent and responds.
Question relates to anyone with experience with the Falcon softwares use in conjunction with WMQ 7.5. Vendor of Falcon only 'certify' their product against 7.0.1.3 you see. I am looking for advice on anyone who has experience.
Hope that helps
Windy |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
| mqjeff |
| Posted: Wed Apr 24, 2013 4:12 am Post subject: |
|
|
Grand Master
Joined: 25 Jun 2008
Posts: 17447
|
That makes sense now.
I hope someone has done this, and can help. I've not. |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
| w1ndy |
| Posted: Wed Apr 24, 2013 4:13 am Post subject: |
|
|
Apprentice
Joined: 19 Jan 2011
Posts: 38
|
| mqjeff wrote: |
That makes sense now.
I hope someone has done this, and can help. I've not. |
No problem. Have a great day. |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
| exerk |
| Posted: Wed Apr 24, 2013 4:25 am Post subject: Re: Ahhhhhhhhhh, well here goes |
|
|
Jedi Council
Joined: 02 Nov 2006
Posts: 6339
|
| w1ndy wrote: |
| Question relates to anyone with experience with the Falcon softwares use in conjunction with WMQ 7.5. Vendor of Falcon only 'certify' their product against 7.0.1.3 you see. I am looking for advice on anyone who has experience. |
The problem I can foresee here is that while Falcon may work quite happily with WMQ V7.5 (like Jeff I have no experience with it either), what happens if a fraudulent transaction is missed - one that in 'normal', i.e. WMQ V7.0.1.3 infrastructure, circumstances would be picked up - and the vendor of Falcon states "...well mate, we did tell you that it was only certified against..."?
_________________
It's puzzling, I don't think I've ever seen anything quite like this before...and it's hard to soar like an eagle when you're surrounded by turkeys. |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
|
|
