| Author |
Message
|
| imrakesh |
 Posted: Wed May 30, 2012 8:47 am Post subject: 9000-MQ-ERROR |
 |
|
Novice
Joined: 10 Apr 2012
Posts: 10
|
Hi,
One of my developer is trying to run a batch program and he gets the below error. any clue ?
****** AMI INPUT MQ INIT SUCCESSFUL ******
3000-READ-MQ
AMI MQ GET WARNING WITH :
CC: 01 RC: 00064
9000-MQ-ERROR
The queue is fine though |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
| Vitor |
| Posted: Wed May 30, 2012 9:29 am Post subject: Re: 9000-MQ-ERROR |
|
|
Grand High Poobah
Joined: 11 Nov 2005
Posts: 26093
Location: Texas, USA
|
| imrakesh wrote: |
| any clue ? |
If the batch program in question is a piece of COBOL of a certain age, then 3000-READ-MQ and 9000-MQ-ERROR sound like COBOL paragraph names and the whole thing looks like a lot of DISPLAY statements.
So I would put it to you that the 3000-READ-MQ paragraph hit a problem & passed control to 9000-MQ-ERROR to report it. Hence I would ask the developer what value the code is returning to yield the "64' code.
But given the developer has not recognised his own DISPLAY statements, that might be beyond him! 
_________________
Honesty is the best policy.
Insanity is the best defence. |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
| bruce2359 |
| Posted: Wed May 30, 2012 1:13 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Poobah
Joined: 05 Jan 2008
Posts: 9469
Location: US: west coast, almost. Otherwise, enroute.
|
AMI is the old (and I believe long out of support) Application Messaging Interface. I haven't seen it in years. AMI allows for packaging MQI calls, with all the appropriate parameters, so that non-MQ developers could call for MQ services without knowing/understanding the MQI.
_________________
I like deadlines. I like to wave as they pass by.
ב''ה
Lex Orandi, Lex Credendi, Lex Vivendi. As we Worship, So we Believe, So we Live. |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
| Mr Butcher |
| Posted: Thu May 31, 2012 1:33 am Post subject: |
|
|
Padawan
Joined: 23 May 2005
Posts: 1716
|
Never throw away old manuals .... 
AMRC_BACKOUT_REQUEUE_ERR 64
The backout count of a received message was found to have exceeded its
backout limit. The message was returned to the application. It could not be
requeued to the backout requeue queue.
_________________
Regards, Butcher |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
| cicsprog |
| Posted: Fri Jun 01, 2012 9:39 am Post subject: |
|
|
Partisan
Joined: 27 Jan 2002
Posts: 347
|
| bruce2359 wrote: |
| AMI is the old (and I believe long out of support) Application Messaging Interface. I haven't seen it in years. AMI allows for packaging MQI calls, with all the appropriate parameters, so that non-MQ developers could call for MQ services without knowing/understanding the MQI. |
http://www-304.ibm.com/support/docview.wss?uid=swg24000641
just not enhanced any longer. |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
| mqjeff |
| Posted: Fri Jun 01, 2012 10:31 am Post subject: |
|
|
Grand Master
Joined: 25 Jun 2008
Posts: 17447
|
| cicsprog wrote: |
| bruce2359 wrote: |
| AMI is the old (and I believe long out of support) Application Messaging Interface. I haven't seen it in years. AMI allows for packaging MQI calls, with all the appropriate parameters, so that non-MQ developers could call for MQ services without knowing/understanding the MQI. |
http://www-304.ibm.com/support/docview.wss?uid=swg24000641
just not enhanced any longer. |
| Quote: |
Software version:
5.3, 6.0
Modified date:
2008-08-14 |
FOR ALL FUTURE READERS, DO NOT USE THIS SUPPORT PAC FOR ANYTHING. |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
| cicsprog |
| Posted: Fri Jun 01, 2012 10:50 am Post subject: |
|
|
Partisan
Joined: 27 Jan 2002
Posts: 347
|
| mqjeff wrote: |
| cicsprog wrote: |
| bruce2359 wrote: |
| AMI is the old (and I believe long out of support) Application Messaging Interface. I haven't seen it in years. AMI allows for packaging MQI calls, with all the appropriate parameters, so that non-MQ developers could call for MQ services without knowing/understanding the MQI. |
http://www-304.ibm.com/support/docview.wss?uid=swg24000641
just not enhanced any longer. |
| Quote: |
Software version:
5.3, 6.0
Modified date:
2008-08-14 |
Just making the point it's still supported. Yes, there are much better alternatives. However, the AMI is nothing more than a series of called subroutines with parms passed and use of the MQ abd DB2 API. Any application currently developed using this methodology will continue to function longer than any of us will be employed.
FOR ALL FUTURE READERS, DO NOT USE THIS SUPPORT PAC FOR ANYTHING. |
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
| mqjeff |
| Posted: Fri Jun 01, 2012 11:01 am Post subject: |
|
|
Grand Master
Joined: 25 Jun 2008
Posts: 17447
|
| cicsprog wrote: |
| Just making the point it's still supported. |
I suspect anyone trying to open a PMR on it would run into some negotiation on that, given that it is not officially supported for any officially supported versions of the software. I.e. 6.0 is out of support, so it's not as clear that this spac *is* still supported. |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
| cicsprog |
| Posted: Fri Jun 01, 2012 12:08 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Partisan
Joined: 27 Jan 2002
Posts: 347
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
| bruce2359 |
| Posted: Fri Jun 01, 2012 12:10 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Poobah
Joined: 05 Jan 2008
Posts: 9469
Location: US: west coast, almost. Otherwise, enroute.
|
| cicsprog wrote: |
| https://www-304.ibm.com/ibmlink/sis/viewEskbDoc.wss?context=aparAndUsage&documentIds=swg24000641&searchWords=mq+ami&libraryType=E&lc=en&cc=US |
This URL prompted for username/password. What would I find there?
_________________
I like deadlines. I like to wave as they pass by.
ב''ה
Lex Orandi, Lex Credendi, Lex Vivendi. As we Worship, So we Believe, So we Live. |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
| cicsprog |
| Posted: Wed Jun 13, 2012 7:52 am Post subject: |
|
|
Partisan
Joined: 27 Jan 2002
Posts: 347
|
| Sorry, it was an IBMLink document on the AMI that has the text I quoted. However, the text I quoted is in the AMI SupportPac under the "Technical Support" heading (which doesn't require signon to IBMLink). |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
| mqjeff |
| Posted: Wed Jun 13, 2012 8:29 am Post subject: |
|
|
Grand Master
Joined: 25 Jun 2008
Posts: 17447
|
| cicsprog wrote: |
| Sorry, it was an IBMLink document on the AMI that has the text I quoted. However, the text I quoted is in the AMI SupportPac under the "Technical Support" heading (which doesn't require signon to IBMLink). |
And nobody should download or use AMI. |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
|
|
