| |
|
RSS Feed - WebSphere MQ Support
|
RSS Feed - Message Broker Support
|
  |
|
| WMQ 7.1 - dspmq status not available after changeover |
« View previous topic :: View next topic » |
| Author |
Message
|
| laurici |
 Posted: Fri Jun 22, 2012 4:51 am Post subject: WMQ 7.1 - dspmq status not available after changeover |
 |
|
Newbie
Joined: 09 Apr 2012
Posts: 7
|
Hi,
We have upgraded the WMQ version from 6.0.2.7 to v7.1 in a AIX HACMP environment.
The upgrade has been made on both nodes and the queue managers are running properly after the upgrade.
I have a question regarding the output of dspmq after a change over is performed:
- On the active node, the queue managers are started automatically and the output is correct: STATUS(Running).
- On the standby node the output of dspmq is STATUS(Status not available).
On WMQ 6.0.2.7, the behavior was different. On the standby node the dspmq output showed the queue managers with STATUS(Ended normally).
I expected to have the same output displayed also for WMQ v7.1.
Please help if you have an explanation for this.
Thank you, Laura |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
| exerk |
| Posted: Fri Jun 22, 2012 5:28 am Post subject: |
|
|
Jedi Council
Joined: 02 Nov 2006
Posts: 6339
|
I think this was a change made to more accurately reflect the status of HA queue managers. The various states are listed on the V7.0 Info Centre page HERE, but with no qualification of the states in relation to HA, and the V6.0 Info Centre page certainly does not list that state.
_________________
It's puzzling, I don't think I've ever seen anything quite like this before...and it's hard to soar like an eagle when you're surrounded by turkeys. |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
| mqjeff |
| Posted: Fri Jun 22, 2012 5:42 am Post subject: |
|
|
Grand Master
Joined: 25 Jun 2008
Posts: 17447
|
Did you establish the queue manager under HA control per the new methods, listed in the info center?
How you configure the queue manager can affect what dspmq can or can not show.
If you've used an older MC91 method or even a home-grown method of making the queue manager available on two machines, this could easily produce the result you're seeing. |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
| bruce2359 |
| Posted: Fri Jun 22, 2012 7:19 am Post subject: |
|
|
Poobah
Joined: 05 Jan 2008
Posts: 9469
Location: US: west coast, almost. Otherwise, enroute.
|
| Quote: |
| I expected to have the same output displayed also for WMQ v7.1. |
New versions bring new functions, which bring new commands and command-responses, which are documented in version-specific documentation.
Alter your expectations accordingly.
_________________
I like deadlines. I like to wave as they pass by.
ב''ה
Lex Orandi, Lex Credendi, Lex Vivendi. As we Worship, So we Believe, So we Live. |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
| laurici |
| Posted: Sun Jun 24, 2012 10:47 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Newbie
Joined: 09 Apr 2012
Posts: 7
|
| mqjeff wrote: |
If you've used an older MC91 method or even a home-grown method of making the queue manager available on two machines, this could easily produce the result you're seeing. |
Yes, I have used the older MC91 method.
I have reconfigured with the information from the infocenter and have created a new queue manager in order to test the entire procedure.
The displayed information for dspmq on the standby node is the same (Status not available) for the new created qmgr.
I will keep searching the documentation, maybe the output is correct.
Thank you, Laura |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
|
|
|
| |
|
Page 1 of 1 |
|
You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot vote in polls in this forum
|
|
|
|
