| |
|
RSS Feed - WebSphere MQ Support
|
RSS Feed - Message Broker Support
|
  |
|
| Datapower (XI52) to datapower (XB60) data transfer best desi |
« View previous topic :: View next topic » |
| Author |
Message
|
| steve_metal |
 Posted: Mon Nov 07, 2011 3:25 am Post subject: Datapower (XI52) to datapower (XB60) data transfer best desi |
 |
|
Novice
Joined: 22 Sep 2009
Posts: 17
|
I have a setup , where an XI52 device will need to pick an MQ message transmit it to the XB60 device which will put it on a destination queue .
How to design the transmission between the data power devices for a source and destination MQ transaction.
To extend it furthur , what is the best (design) practise for communication between two datapower devices for differnt protocols (say ftp , http , MQ etc).
Thanks
Steve
_________________
Nonsense is just so relative ....
Steve |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
| Gaya3 |
| Posted: Mon Nov 07, 2011 7:08 am Post subject: Re: Datapower (XI52) to datapower (XB60) data transfer best |
|
|
Jedi
Joined: 12 Sep 2006
Posts: 2493
Location: Boston, US
|
| steve_metal wrote: |
I have a setup , where an XI52 device will need to pick an MQ message transmit it to the XB60 device which will put it on a destination queue .
How to design the transmission between the data power devices for a source and destination MQ transaction.
To extend it furthur , what is the best (design) practise for communication between two datapower devices for differnt protocols (say ftp , http , MQ etc).
Thanks
Steve |
HTTP or MQ will be the best way.
MQ is much more reliable 
_________________
Regards
Gayathri
-----------------------------------------------
Do Something Before you Die |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
| steve_metal |
| Posted: Tue Nov 08, 2011 1:22 am Post subject: |
|
|
Novice
Joined: 22 Sep 2009
Posts: 17
|
Invariably you mean I need a queue manager inbetween the data power devices if I am to use MQ .
There are some messages which have sizes 50 - 80 MB through MQ , will http be recommended then ?
_________________
Nonsense is just so relative ....
Steve |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
| zpat |
| Posted: Tue Nov 08, 2011 2:08 am Post subject: |
|
|
Jedi Council
Joined: 19 May 2001
Posts: 5866
Location: UK
|
These appliances are only MQ clients. Clients cannot directly send messages to other MQ clients.
If you send over http or ftp - you introduce a transactional weakness, which you may or may not consider an issue.
You should probably use https or sftp though. Perhaps sftp using keys not passwords would be the best option if you can't use MQ. |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
| mqjeff |
| Posted: Tue Nov 08, 2011 3:00 am Post subject: |
|
|
Grand Master
Joined: 25 Jun 2008
Posts: 17447
|
MQ is good for messages up to 100mb each, with planning.
As is mentioned, you need a queue manager in the middle.
In general, HTTP is a terrible protocol for shipping any kind of data larger than about 10MB. MQ is better.
FTP is fine for transfers up to whatever size you want, but is subject to all of the problems of working with files - for example not being able to tell that the transfer is complete. |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
|
|
|
| |
|
Page 1 of 1 |
|
You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot vote in polls in this forum
|
|
|
|
