| Author |
Message
|
| kalyandharanikota |
 Posted: Tue Aug 16, 2011 11:40 pm Post subject: Need to create 2 qm's 1 primary and secondary |
 |
|
Novice
Joined: 16 Aug 2011
Posts: 11
|
| The new two MQ managers are MQ08A1.011802.01 (primary) and MQ08B1.011802.01 (secondary).can i know how can i make the switchover between the qm's if workload.And how can i create these qm's. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
| zpat |
| Posted: Tue Aug 16, 2011 11:46 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Jedi Council
Joined: 19 May 2001
Posts: 5866
Location: UK
|
Do you have any relevant MQ training, preparation or other prior knowledge?
Or is this a "trying to run before walking" situation? |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
| kalyandharanikota |
| Posted: Wed Aug 17, 2011 12:26 am Post subject: |
|
|
Novice
Joined: 16 Aug 2011
Posts: 11
|
| I require to create the 2 qm's,one must be active and other must be passive to overcome workload. |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
| exerk |
| Posted: Wed Aug 17, 2011 12:45 am Post subject: |
|
|
Jedi Council
Joined: 02 Nov 2006
Posts: 6339
|
| kalyandharanikota wrote: |
| I require to create the 2 qm's |
The very comprehensive manuals tell you how, i.e. the command to run.
| kalyandharanikota wrote: |
| one must be active and other must be passive to overcome workload. |
Overcome workload? If you mean you want to split (load-balance) then you need two active queue managers.
_________________
It's puzzling, I don't think I've ever seen anything quite like this before...and it's hard to soar like an eagle when you're surrounded by turkeys. |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
| zpat |
| Posted: Wed Aug 17, 2011 12:50 am Post subject: |
|
|
Jedi Council
Joined: 19 May 2001
Posts: 5866
Location: UK
|
| Could be HA, could be MI, could be several things. Useful to know something about the subject before asking for help. |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
| kalyandharanikota |
| Posted: Wed Aug 17, 2011 12:57 am Post subject: |
|
|
Novice
Joined: 16 Aug 2011
Posts: 11
|
As i said,for load balance i need to create 2 qm's/one active one passive.
*if one qm goes down,then the passive qm must start running. |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
| exerk |
| Posted: Wed Aug 17, 2011 1:01 am Post subject: |
|
|
Jedi Council
Joined: 02 Nov 2006
Posts: 6339
|
I repeat: active/passive is not load balancing.
As zpat has stated you need to refine your requirement to enable more appropriate advice, but at first glance I would say you need a single, highly-available queue manager.
_________________
It's puzzling, I don't think I've ever seen anything quite like this before...and it's hard to soar like an eagle when you're surrounded by turkeys. |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
| kalyandharanikota |
| Posted: Wed Aug 17, 2011 1:05 am Post subject: |
|
|
Novice
Joined: 16 Aug 2011
Posts: 11
|
| Thanks ,I need MI queue managers. |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
| exerk |
| Posted: Wed Aug 17, 2011 1:06 am Post subject: |
|
|
Jedi Council
Joined: 02 Nov 2006
Posts: 6339
|
The 'how to' is all there in the manuals.
_________________
It's puzzling, I don't think I've ever seen anything quite like this before...and it's hard to soar like an eagle when you're surrounded by turkeys. |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
| kalyandharanikota |
| Posted: Wed Aug 17, 2011 1:10 am Post subject: |
|
|
Novice
Joined: 16 Aug 2011
Posts: 11
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
| zpat |
| Posted: Wed Aug 17, 2011 1:12 am Post subject: |
|
|
Jedi Council
Joined: 19 May 2001
Posts: 5866
Location: UK
|
Does the IP address have to remain the same after failover - if it does then MI won't do the job (unless DNS redirection is sufficient).
HA depends on platform - which is it? |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
| kalyandharanikota |
| Posted: Wed Aug 17, 2011 1:17 am Post subject: |
|
|
Novice
Joined: 16 Aug 2011
Posts: 11
|
| The Ip address must remain the same after failover. |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
| exerk |
| Posted: Wed Aug 17, 2011 1:23 am Post subject: |
|
|
Jedi Council
Joined: 02 Nov 2006
Posts: 6339
|
| kalyandharanikota wrote: |
| The Ip address must remain the same after failover. |
Why? If all your other connecting infrastructure at V7.0.1 you can use MI, otherwise it's a different flavour of HA you need.
_________________
It's puzzling, I don't think I've ever seen anything quite like this before...and it's hard to soar like an eagle when you're surrounded by turkeys. |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
| kalyandharanikota |
| Posted: Wed Aug 17, 2011 1:58 am Post subject: |
|
|
Novice
Joined: 16 Aug 2011
Posts: 11
|
| But here its not cluster env,so i cant use HA.Thats y i m relying on MI. |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
| exerk |
| Posted: Wed Aug 17, 2011 2:00 am Post subject: |
|
|
Jedi Council
Joined: 02 Nov 2006
Posts: 6339
|
| kalyandharanikota wrote: |
| But here its not cluster env,so i cant use HA.Thats y i m relying on MI. |
That does not answer my question as to why the IP Address has to remain the same after fail-over, so, again, why?
_________________
It's puzzling, I don't think I've ever seen anything quite like this before...and it's hard to soar like an eagle when you're surrounded by turkeys. |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
|
|
