| Author |
Message
|
| ollyc |
 Posted: Fri Jul 08, 2011 7:17 am Post subject: User Defined Nodes and Subclipse |
 |
|
Apprentice
Joined: 04 Dec 2009
Posts: 27
Location: England
|
Hi All,
We use Subclipse quite happily with normal flow and message set development - but it stops the packaging of User Defined Nodes.
if I hit Package then select the plug-in Jars option, then I get:
| Code: |
The UDN flow /FTPGetFile_UNP/com/dhl/hubware/ftp/FTPGetFile_SF.msgflow cannot be compiled. Rebuild all the user-defined nodes projects in the workspace and make sure they are free of errors before proceeding.
Status ERROR: com.ibm.etools.mft.bar code=4 Resource FTPGetFile_SF.msgflow cannot be added to the BAR file because it does not contain any input nodes. null |
Packaging works fine if I disconnect the project from Subclipse and also delete the SVN metadata.
but this then becomes a hassle moving files around to try to get them back into SVN 
This is a problem with the latest versions of Subclipse (1.6.18 ) and WMB toolkit (7.0.0.2).
Would appreciate any help or advice on this... |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
| lancelotlinc |
| Posted: Fri Jul 08, 2011 7:43 am Post subject: |
|
|
Jedi Knight
Joined: 22 Mar 2010
Posts: 4941
Location: Bloomington, IL USA
|
As a work around until you get subclipse + toolkit operational again, you can check files in and out in-place using TortoiseSVN.
To solve the problem, I would post a request in the Subclipse support forum and specify WMB's Eclipse version you are currently using. Apparently some hiccup between Subclipse and Eclipse is greasing the floor. Also, a Subclipse x.0 release on June 1, 2011 would have possible negative impacts; so a good strategy maybe to fall back to the earlier subclipse version until they get it straightened out.
Good luck with it. Please post the resolution when you find it.
_________________
http://leanpub.com/IIB_Tips_and_Tricks
Save $20: Coupon Code: MQSERIES_READER |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
| ollyc |
| Posted: Fri Jul 08, 2011 8:17 am Post subject: |
|
|
Apprentice
Joined: 04 Dec 2009
Posts: 27
Location: England
|
Thanks for the input - I had been using older versions but had upgraded to see if it helped.
if i use tortoiseSVN or similar to check the project out and then import it as "Existing Projects into Workspace" then Subclipse still sees it as a SVN project and I get the same problem.
It could be a problem with the package process not liking some SVN files - I'll try hacking with the project files to see if I can fix it. |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
| lancelotlinc |
| Posted: Fri Jul 08, 2011 8:46 am Post subject: |
|
|
Jedi Knight
Joined: 22 Mar 2010
Posts: 4941
Location: Bloomington, IL USA
|
IBM ClearCase offers tremendous integration strength with WMB toolkit. I prefer it over SVN. If possible, you might elevate an idea to migrate to ClearCase.
_________________
http://leanpub.com/IIB_Tips_and_Tricks
Save $20: Coupon Code: MQSERIES_READER |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
| fjb_saper |
| Posted: Fri Jul 08, 2011 11:09 am Post subject: Re: User Defined Nodes and Subclipse |
|
|
Grand High Poobah
Joined: 18 Nov 2003
Posts: 20756
Location: LI,NY
|
| ollyc wrote: |
Packaging works fine if I disconnect the project from Subclipse and also delete the SVN metadata.
but this then becomes a hassle moving files around to try to get them back into SVN
This is a problem with the latest versions of Subclipse (1.6.18 ) and WMB toolkit (7.0.0.2).
Would appreciate any help or advice on this... |
No, you should just only build from a saved stage (trunk or tag).
At that point disconnect from subclipse, do your build and just check the project out again... 
_________________
MQ & Broker admin |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
| smdavies99 |
| Posted: Fri Jul 08, 2011 11:31 am Post subject: |
|
|
Jedi Council
Joined: 10 Feb 2003
Posts: 6076
Location: Somewhere over the Rainbow this side of Never-never land.
|
ClearCase does have some advantages over SVN.
SVN does have some advantages over ClearCase.
my pet gripe with CC is that the merge manager insists on checking out the merged items despite telling it that you don't want them checked out.
my pet gripe with SVN is that items checked out with Subclipse are almost impossible to 'fix' with svn/tortoise if you have inadvertently deleted the workspace that contained the checked out items.
IMHO, 'git' is better than either of them.
you pays your money (or not) and... well you know the rest.
_________________
WMQ User since 1999
MQSI/WBI/WMB/'Thingy' User since 2002
Linux user since 1995
Every time you reinvent the wheel the more square it gets (anon). If in doubt think and investigate before you ask silly questions. |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
|
|
