ASG
IBM
Zystems
Cressida
Icon
Netflexity
 
  MQSeries.net
Search  Search       Tech Exchange      Education      Certifications      Library      Info Center      SupportPacs      LinkedIn  Search  Search                                                                   FAQ  FAQ   Usergroups  Usergroups
 
Register  ::  Log in Log in to check your private messages
 
RSS Feed - WebSphere MQ Support RSS Feed - Message Broker Support

MQSeries.net Forum Index » General Discussion » multiple queue managers/single queue manager

Post new topic  Reply to topic
 multiple queue managers/single queue manager « View previous topic :: View next topic » 
Author Message
anveshita
PostPosted: Wed Jun 15, 2011 8:16 am    Post subject: multiple queue managers/single queue manager Reply with quote

Master

Joined: 27 Sep 2004
Posts: 254
Location: Jambudweepam

I understand having single queue manager reduces the maintenance. But if I have two different customers ( external to my organization) or different companies, is it a good idea to have two different queue managers to cater to the needs so that I could separate them altogether? Please share your comments/suggestions what your take.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
exerk
PostPosted: Wed Jun 15, 2011 11:21 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

Jedi Council

Joined: 02 Nov 2006
Posts: 6339

I would say it depends on the load a single queue manager may experience, whether the processing of messages from one company will affect the performance to an extent that it will negatively impact the other company's traffic being processed, and whether you can be sure of segregating the traffic (DLQ excepted). If you go down the route of separate queue managers you may also want to consider separate servers to house them if one company's queue manager is a resource hog. You haven't really provided sufficient information to suggest either option as being optimal.
_________________
It's puzzling, I don't think I've ever seen anything quite like this before...and it's hard to soar like an eagle when you're surrounded by turkeys.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
bruce2359
PostPosted: Wed Jun 15, 2011 12:17 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Poobah

Joined: 05 Jan 2008
Posts: 9469
Location: US: west coast, almost. Otherwise, enroute.

If I'm one of your clients, I'd like to ensure that your other clients can't get to my qmgr and its queues. So, I'd require (demand) a single qmgr for me, with SSL-enabled channels.
_________________
I like deadlines. I like to wave as they pass by.
ב''ה
Lex Orandi, Lex Credendi, Lex Vivendi. As we Worship, So we Believe, So we Live.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
mvic
PostPosted: Wed Jun 15, 2011 12:37 pm    Post subject: Re: multiple queue managers/single queue manager Reply with quote

Jedi

Joined: 09 Mar 2004
Posts: 2080

anveshita wrote:
Please share your comments/suggestions what your take.

Perhaps send emails to the two customers, asking them to tell you their requirements. They will know their requirements better than the people on mqseries.net.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
bruce2359
PostPosted: Wed Jun 15, 2011 2:19 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Poobah

Joined: 05 Jan 2008
Posts: 9469
Location: US: west coast, almost. Otherwise, enroute.

One can only hope.
_________________
I like deadlines. I like to wave as they pass by.
ב''ה
Lex Orandi, Lex Credendi, Lex Vivendi. As we Worship, So we Believe, So we Live.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
PeterPotkay
PostPosted: Wed Jun 15, 2011 5:23 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Poobah

Joined: 15 May 2001
Posts: 7722

bruce2359 wrote:
If I'm one of your clients, I'd like to ensure that your other clients can't get to my qmgr and its queues. So, I'd require (demand) a single qmgr for me, with SSL-enabled channels.

Assuming proper MQ Authority has been set up (big assumption), why would you care if your queues are on the same QM as another company? They can't get at your queues and you can't get at their's on a properly secured QM. If MQ security is poor, it likely you can get at the other queues and they can get at your queues even if they are on separate QMs, assuming a typical interconnected MQ topology.

If you can segregate the QMs onto separate servers and the QMs are not interconnected, that may be an easier way to achieve this goal, albeit more expensive in a few ways.
_________________
Peter Potkay
Keep Calm and MQ On
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
bruce2359
PostPosted: Thu Jun 16, 2011 5:31 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

Poobah

Joined: 05 Jan 2008
Posts: 9469
Location: US: west coast, almost. Otherwise, enroute.

PeterPotkay wrote:

Assuming proper MQ Authority has been set up (big assumption)...


From discussions here I'm presuming that few may have achieved proper MQ authority.

So, as a paying customer, I'm going to take the conservative position, namely: give me a stand-alone server, give me a qmgr of my own.
_________________
I like deadlines. I like to wave as they pass by.
ב''ה
Lex Orandi, Lex Credendi, Lex Vivendi. As we Worship, So we Believe, So we Live.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Toronto_MQ
PostPosted: Fri Jun 17, 2011 6:33 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

Master

Joined: 10 Jul 2002
Posts: 263
Location: read my name

We don't create a new qmgr for each external customer/partner, nor would I expect them to do this for me.

I do expect them, however, to have proper security in place.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
bruce2359
PostPosted: Fri Jun 17, 2011 8:39 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

Poobah

Joined: 05 Jan 2008
Posts: 9469
Location: US: west coast, almost. Otherwise, enroute.

I read this as if the OP is a service bureau that offers platforms for others to deploy applications. I did not read this as the client/customer was a supplier or purchaser.
_________________
I like deadlines. I like to wave as they pass by.
ב''ה
Lex Orandi, Lex Credendi, Lex Vivendi. As we Worship, So we Believe, So we Live.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
anveshita
PostPosted: Fri Jun 17, 2011 11:55 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

Master

Joined: 27 Sep 2004
Posts: 254
Location: Jambudweepam

Thanks for your input. The agreement contained a clause to use industry best practices. So we are good having a single queue manager and yes with proper security to each application.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
brianb
PostPosted: Sun Jun 19, 2011 9:32 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Voyager

Joined: 12 May 2010
Posts: 85

hmmm

I can think of many reasons to host one company per QM and LPAR

Mainly maintenance and SLA

Even internally if is difficult to apply Fixpacks/upgrades etc in regards to down time

Customer one fix it now customer 2 nothing wrong with our app

Also do you want someone elses error ie full queue , looping messages to affect more than one customer


many many many things
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
bruce2359
PostPosted: Mon Jun 20, 2011 4:42 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

Poobah

Joined: 05 Jan 2008
Posts: 9469
Location: US: west coast, almost. Otherwise, enroute.

There are other discussions here on "which is better: multiple queues on one qmgr? or few queues on multiple qmgrs?"

It depends.
_________________
I like deadlines. I like to wave as they pass by.
ב''ה
Lex Orandi, Lex Credendi, Lex Vivendi. As we Worship, So we Believe, So we Live.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Display posts from previous:   
Post new topic  Reply to topic Page 1 of 1

MQSeries.net Forum Index » General Discussion » multiple queue managers/single queue manager
Jump to:  



You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot vote in polls in this forum
Protected by Anti-Spam ACP
 
 


Theme by Dustin Baccetti
Powered by phpBB © 2001, 2002 phpBB Group

Copyright © MQSeries.net. All rights reserved.