| Author |
Message
|
| rahuldhanpal |
 Posted: Wed Sep 29, 2010 10:57 am Post subject: Channel State |
 |
|
Voyager
Joined: 24 Jan 2009
Posts: 84
Location: Kenosha WI
|
Hi guys,
I am just curious to know if anybody has seen the state of SVRCONN channel state as mixed.
any explanation about this state is highly appreciated
Thanks
Rahul |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
| mvic |
| Posted: Wed Sep 29, 2010 12:34 pm Post subject: Re: Channel State |
|
|
Jedi
Joined: 09 Mar 2004
Posts: 2080
|
| rahuldhanpal wrote: |
| I am just curious to know if anybody has seen the state of SVRCONN channel state as mixed. |
Please will you post some outputs to demonstrate what you mean? |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
| rahuldhanpal |
| Posted: Wed Sep 29, 2010 1:00 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Voyager
Joined: 24 Jan 2009
Posts: 84
Location: Kenosha WI
|
i was checking the status of the channels from my explorer and found that overall channel status property of one of the svrconn channel showed as mixed. And i did not find this state it in contact admin documentation so trying to figure out what this state means.
let me know if you understood what i meant
Thanks
RD |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
| mvic |
| Posted: Wed Sep 29, 2010 1:16 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Jedi
Joined: 09 Mar 2004
Posts: 2080
|
| What do you see from runmqsc? (Output from runmqsc is easier to copy/paste into this forum). |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
| rahuldhanpal |
| Posted: Wed Sep 29, 2010 1:25 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Voyager
Joined: 24 Jan 2009
Posts: 84
Location: Kenosha WI
|
currently the status is running i will post the runmqsc output once the state goes to mixed again so that it will be easy. the current status is
CHANNEL(SSL.ESBTNT.SVRCONN) CHLTYPE(SVRCONN)
CONNAME(removed) CURRENT
RQMNAME( ) STATUS(RUNNING)
SUBSTATE(RECEIVE) XMITQ( )
thanks
RD |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
| mvic |
| Posted: Wed Sep 29, 2010 1:28 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Jedi
Joined: 09 Mar 2004
Posts: 2080
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
| rahuldhanpal |
| Posted: Wed Sep 29, 2010 1:38 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Voyager
Joined: 24 Jan 2009
Posts: 84
Location: Kenosha WI
|
Many Thanks mvic. i got what i was looking for.
Actually an application is connected to the channel with multiple instances and as mentioned in the documentation now i got what i wanted to know.
Thanks for all the help mvic. i really appreciate your help. |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
| mvic |
| Posted: Wed Sep 29, 2010 1:39 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Jedi
Joined: 09 Mar 2004
Posts: 2080
|
| rahuldhanpal wrote: |
| Thanks for all the help mvic. i really appreciate your help. |
You're welcome.  |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
| PeteHanbury |
| Posted: Mon Apr 18, 2011 6:13 am Post subject: MIXED CHANNEL STATUS |
|
|
Novice
Joined: 13 Apr 2004
Posts: 23
Location: US AND EUROPE
|
Well It seems IBM are trying to get some error reporting finally inplace ... Shame they dont tell anyone about it :
Anyway : We had the same issue here after implementing Mutual Authentication on the channels. But once we killed the MQSeries explorer sessions of other inactive users, then the channel reverted to a RUNNING state
_________________
PeteHanbury
Independent IBM MQSeries/MQSI Architecture Certified Contractor
Last edited by PeteHanbury on Mon Apr 18, 2011 7:48 am; edited 1 time in total |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
| mvic |
| Posted: Mon Apr 18, 2011 6:19 am Post subject: Re: MIXED CHANNEL STATUS |
|
|
Jedi
Joined: 09 Mar 2004
Posts: 2080
|
| PeteHanbury wrote: |
| Well It seems IBM are trying to get some error reporting finally inplace ... Shame they dont tell anyone about it : |
What are IBM doing, exactly? Presumably you found out somehow: how did you find out? |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
| gbaddeley |
| Posted: Mon Apr 18, 2011 7:27 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Jedi Knight
Joined: 25 Mar 2003
Posts: 2538
Location: Melbourne, Australia
|
| rahuldhanpal wrote: |
| Actually an application is connected to the channel with multiple instances and as mentioned in the documentation now i got what i wanted to know. |
An app using the Multi Instance client feature couldl have 1 active svrconn channel session (aka TCP socket, as shown by dis chstatus on the qmgr) but there may be many Connections multiplexed on that one active channel, some of which may be in different states. This may account for MIXED status. That's my current theory anyway....
_________________
Glenn |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
| mvic |
| Posted: Tue Apr 19, 2011 12:45 am Post subject: |
|
|
Jedi
Joined: 09 Mar 2004
Posts: 2080
|
| gbaddeley wrote: |
| That's my current theory anyway.... |
Probably correct, it would match what was said at the link I gave anyway. |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
|
|
