Author |
Message
|
mbguy |
Posted: Fri Oct 29, 2010 2:46 pm Post subject: SVRCONN channel not found |
|
|
Apprentice
Joined: 23 Jul 2008 Posts: 25
|
HI
We are getting the below error
10/29/10 17:52:15 - Process(675846.175174) User(mqm) Program(amqrmppa)
AMQ9999: Channel program ended abnormally.
EXPLANATION:
Channel program 'WMSORT.31.SVRCONN' ended abnormally.
ACTION:
Look at previous error messages for channel program 'WMSORT.31.SVRCONN' in the
error files to determine the cause of the failure.
When we tried to find the channel status it says the channel is no tfound
display channel(WMSORT.31.SVRCONN) type(SVRCONN)
1 : display channel(WMSORT.31.SVRCONN) type(SVRCONN)
AMQ8147: WebSphere MQ object WMSORT.31.SVRCONN not found.
can anyone tell us if the channel itself is not existing or is there any other reason for the getting this msg
AMQ8147: WebSphere MQ object WMSORT.31.SVRCONN not found. |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
shashivarungupta |
Posted: Fri Oct 29, 2010 7:11 pm Post subject: |
|
|
 Grand Master
Joined: 24 Feb 2009 Posts: 1343 Location: Floating in space on a round rock.
|
Are you checking in the correct queue manager?
In your architecture, your queue managers are part of some cluster ? Or you are expecting the channel to be part of some cluster/NL and you are checking it from somewhere else ?
Has someone played with the files of your mq objects ?
 _________________ *Life will beat you down, you need to decide to fight back or leave it. |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
exerk |
Posted: Sat Oct 30, 2010 3:14 am Post subject: Re: SVRCONN channel not found |
|
|
 Jedi Council
Joined: 02 Nov 2006 Posts: 6339
|
mbguy wrote: |
...When we tried to find the channel status it says the channel is not found... |
If you were checking for status and none was found, no surprises there. A SVRCONN is essentially passive until invoked, and if it cannot run (or be in a non-inactive state), then no status will be returned.
mbguy wrote: |
...display channel(WMSORT.31.SVRCONN) type(SVRCONN)
1 : display channel(WMSORT.31.SVRCONN) type(SVRCONN)
AMQ8147: WebSphere MQ object WMSORT.31.SVRCONN not found... |
Pretty conclusive...
mbguy wrote: |
...can anyone tell us if the channel itself is not existing or is there any other reason for the getting this msg
AMQ8147: WebSphere MQ object WMSORT.31.SVRCONN not found. |
See my previous comment... _________________ It's puzzling, I don't think I've ever seen anything quite like this before...and it's hard to soar like an eagle when you're surrounded by turkeys. |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
mqjeff |
Posted: Sat Oct 30, 2010 3:16 am Post subject: |
|
|
Grand Master
Joined: 25 Jun 2008 Posts: 17447
|
The only reason this message will be produced is if an application tries to connect using this channel name. |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
exerk |
Posted: Sat Oct 30, 2010 3:18 am Post subject: |
|
|
 Jedi Council
Joined: 02 Nov 2006 Posts: 6339
|
shashivarungupta wrote: |
Are you checking in the correct queue manager? |
Good point...
shashivarungupta wrote: |
In your architecture, your queue managers are part of some cluster ? Or you are expecting the channel to be part of some cluster/NL... |
Pray tell, in which version of WMQ was the CLUSSVRCONN object added?
shashivarungupta wrote: |
...Has someone played with the files of your mq objects ?
 |
Another good point.
2 out of 3 - not bad, you're getting better  _________________ It's puzzling, I don't think I've ever seen anything quite like this before...and it's hard to soar like an eagle when you're surrounded by turkeys. |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
mqjeff |
Posted: Sat Oct 30, 2010 3:55 am Post subject: |
|
|
Grand Master
Joined: 25 Jun 2008 Posts: 17447
|
exerk wrote: |
shashivarungupta wrote: |
In your architecture, your queue managers are part of some cluster ? Or you are expecting the channel to be part of some cluster/NL... |
Pray tell, in which version of WMQ was the CLUSSVRCONN object added?  |
I don't think we can assume that shashivarungupta believes this to be possible, just that shashivarungupta believes that other people might. |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
shashivarungupta |
Posted: Sat Oct 30, 2010 9:02 am Post subject: |
|
|
 Grand Master
Joined: 24 Feb 2009 Posts: 1343 Location: Floating in space on a round rock.
|
Quote: |
..in which version of WMQ was the CLUSSVRCONN object added?..
|
Ooopsssss !! cause I was being distracted by an offer of bachelor's eve. on Saturday !!
My Apologies !!
Quote: |
..I don't think we can assume that shashivarungupta believes this to be possible.. |
I never thought that way.. but if I would assume that then would think what will happen in mq if there would be cluster server conn. channels too.  _________________ *Life will beat you down, you need to decide to fight back or leave it. |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
SAFraser |
Posted: Sat Oct 30, 2010 6:52 pm Post subject: |
|
|
 Shaman
Joined: 22 Oct 2003 Posts: 742 Location: Austin, Texas, USA
|
If I got a message that an object does not exist, I would try to define it. If I then got a message that the object already exists, that would be a clue that something has gotten dreadfully corrupted. |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
|