Author |
Message
|
Pavan Kumar PNV |
Posted: Mon Oct 04, 2010 5:12 pm Post subject: Messaging Tools comparision |
|
|
 Acolyte
Joined: 03 Feb 2007 Posts: 66
|
|
Back to top |
|
 |
fjb_saper |
Posted: Mon Oct 04, 2010 8:03 pm Post subject: |
|
|
 Grand High Poobah
Joined: 18 Nov 2003 Posts: 20756 Location: LI,NY
|
Nice list, with some caveats....
The Oracle Messaging Gateway is not a MOM... it is a MOM bridge (AQ to a JMS oriented MOM IIRC)...
The MOM's listed have a widely different OS/Programing language availability.
Also there is no feature or API / standard compliance comparison...
Have fun  _________________ MQ & Broker admin |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
elvis_gn |
Posted: Mon Oct 04, 2010 10:43 pm Post subject: |
|
|
 Padawan
Joined: 08 Oct 2004 Posts: 1905 Location: Dubai
|
Hi Pavan,
Where did you get the 90% market share figure ? I'd heard 83% in 2005 or so in one of the IBM MQ Brochures, and have been trying to get the official figure now...can you please provide the source...
Regards. |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
zpat |
Posted: Mon Oct 04, 2010 11:33 pm Post subject: |
|
|
 Jedi Council
Joined: 19 May 2001 Posts: 5866 Location: UK
|
Quote: |
The product is so popular that a lot of consultants working in space can't think beyond this product for the advantages it offers |
Well, down here on Earth, most consultants can think beyound MQ, even if they don't.  |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
Pavan Kumar PNV |
Posted: Tue Oct 05, 2010 7:07 am Post subject: |
|
|
 Acolyte
Joined: 03 Feb 2007 Posts: 66
|
Hi Elvis, I assumed that with recent releases of MQ and the changes that came with them coupled with new sub-products like MQ-LLM and MQ-FTE, it would have jumped from 83 to about 90. It is only an approximate figure.
Thanks Saper, I will try to include Portability across platforms and API support. By standards and compliance are you referring to JMS, SOAP, HA etc?
@zpat Well, that is probably true. But looking at the % share WMQ has, I seriously doubt if a majority of them bother to go explore beyond it.
Thank you all for reviewing the list. Will post back the updated list. _________________ _____________
Pavan Pendyala
http://pavanz.blogspot.com |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
elvis_gn |
Posted: Tue Oct 05, 2010 7:37 am Post subject: |
|
|
 Padawan
Joined: 08 Oct 2004 Posts: 1905 Location: Dubai
|
Hi Pavan Kumar PNV,
Pavan Kumar PNV wrote: |
Hi Elvis, I assumed that with recent releases of MQ and the changes that came with them coupled with new sub-products like MQ-LLM and MQ-FTE, it would have jumped from 83 to about 90. It is only an approximate figure. |
Such things could land you up in lawsuits
Regards. |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
Pavan Kumar PNV |
Posted: Tue Oct 05, 2010 7:44 am Post subject: |
|
|
 Acolyte
Joined: 03 Feb 2007 Posts: 66
|
Changed my post to reflect the official 83% in 2005 figure. Not inviting any trouble here  _________________ _____________
Pavan Pendyala
http://pavanz.blogspot.com |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
|