Author |
Message
|
zpat |
Posted: Wed Sep 01, 2010 11:17 am Post subject: WMQ 7.0.1.3 |
|
|
 Jedi Council
Joined: 19 May 2001 Posts: 5866 Location: UK
|
I notice that fixpack WMQ 7.0.1.3 is now out.
I've had at least one FDC that is fixed in this release (and 2 that are not).
Interested to hear any other views on whether it's better to install 7.0.1.3 or stick with 7.0.1.2 (now that I have already started the rollout)?
I can never remember - is it the odd or even fixpacks that are fixes and not new functions?
The only new function I can see in 7.0.1.3 is some explorer features. |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
mqjeff |
Posted: Wed Sep 01, 2010 11:26 am Post subject: Re: WMQ 7.0.1.3 |
|
|
Grand Master
Joined: 25 Jun 2008 Posts: 17447
|
zpat wrote: |
I can never remember - is it the odd or even fixpacks that are fixes and not new functions? |
new function is supposed to come with an increase in at least n.n.X.n, or n.X.n.n, and not just be n.n.n.X where X=X+1.
That's why we went from 7.0.0.x to 7.0.1.x. |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
fjb_saper |
Posted: Wed Sep 01, 2010 2:24 pm Post subject: Re: WMQ 7.0.1.3 |
|
|
 Grand High Poobah
Joined: 18 Nov 2003 Posts: 20756 Location: LI,NY
|
zpat wrote: |
I notice that fixpack WMQ 7.0.1.3 is now out.
I've had at least one FDC that is fixed in this release (and 2 that are not).
Interested to hear any other views on whether it's better to install 7.0.1.3 or stick with 7.0.1.2 (now that I have already started the rollout)?
I can never remember - is it the odd or even fixpacks that are fixes and not new functions?
The only new function I can see in 7.0.1.3 is some explorer features. |
If you are doing JMS or sharing connections you really want 7.0.1.4  _________________ MQ & Broker admin |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
zpat |
Posted: Wed Sep 01, 2010 11:26 pm Post subject: Re: WMQ 7.0.1.3 |
|
|
 Jedi Council
Joined: 19 May 2001 Posts: 5866 Location: UK
|
fjb_saper wrote: |
If you are doing JMS or sharing connections you really want 7.0.1.4  |
Hmm, can you explain why and whether this impacts QM upgrades or client upgrades? |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
fjb_saper |
Posted: Thu Sep 02, 2010 8:14 am Post subject: Re: WMQ 7.0.1.3 |
|
|
 Grand High Poobah
Joined: 18 Nov 2003 Posts: 20756 Location: LI,NY
|
zpat wrote: |
fjb_saper wrote: |
If you are doing JMS or sharing connections you really want 7.0.1.4  |
Hmm, can you explain why and whether this impacts QM upgrades or client upgrades? |
Why? Just by looking at the list of fixes for those areas targeted for delivery in 7.0.1.4... Impacting possibly both Server and client upgrades... no telling until you tested it.  _________________ MQ & Broker admin |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
zpat |
Posted: Thu Sep 02, 2010 11:13 pm Post subject: |
|
|
 Jedi Council
Joined: 19 May 2001 Posts: 5866 Location: UK
|
This is not good news. WMQ is supposed to be a mature product. |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
bruce2359 |
Posted: Fri Sep 03, 2010 6:20 am Post subject: |
|
|
 Poobah
Joined: 05 Jan 2008 Posts: 9469 Location: US: west coast, almost. Otherwise, enroute.
|
Upgrades/maintenance introduces the possibility of new bugs. There is risk associated with change.
Not upgrading/maintaining guarantees that known bugs are not corrected. There is risk associated with not changing.
"Damned if you do; damned if you don't." (Simpson, Bart) _________________ I like deadlines. I like to wave as they pass by.
ב''ה
Lex Orandi, Lex Credendi, Lex Vivendi. As we Worship, So we Believe, So we Live. |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
Vitor |
Posted: Fri Sep 03, 2010 6:30 am Post subject: |
|
|
 Grand High Poobah
Joined: 11 Nov 2005 Posts: 26093 Location: Texas, USA
|
zpat wrote: |
WMQ is supposed to be a mature product. |
This means it has fewer bugs and more features than an immature product.
That fixes are being applied to both client and server code has nothing to do with maturity.
That applying fixes can cause problems is a fact of any software.
That IBM's reputation is behind these fixes gives some comfort (though we all remember v5.3 CSD 08 ).
Only testing can prove the effect of any fixes in your specific code & site. _________________ Honesty is the best policy.
Insanity is the best defence.
Last edited by Vitor on Fri Sep 03, 2010 6:31 am; edited 1 time in total |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
mqjeff |
Posted: Fri Sep 03, 2010 6:30 am Post subject: |
|
|
Grand Master
Joined: 25 Jun 2008 Posts: 17447
|
MQ is a mature product with new features. |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
bruce2359 |
Posted: Fri Sep 03, 2010 6:36 am Post subject: |
|
|
 Poobah
Joined: 05 Jan 2008 Posts: 9469 Location: US: west coast, almost. Otherwise, enroute.
|
...and improved performance and reliability. _________________ I like deadlines. I like to wave as they pass by.
ב''ה
Lex Orandi, Lex Credendi, Lex Vivendi. As we Worship, So we Believe, So we Live. |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
zpat |
Posted: Fri Sep 03, 2010 6:40 am Post subject: |
|
|
 Jedi Council
Joined: 19 May 2001 Posts: 5866 Location: UK
|
I am not talking about fixes causing bugs, I am talking about how many problems are being uncovered in WMQ v7.
IBM described this as "production ready" when it was GA.
Now. I am the worlds biggest MQ fan - but.....
Last edited by zpat on Fri Sep 03, 2010 6:47 am; edited 1 time in total |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
Vitor |
Posted: Fri Sep 03, 2010 6:46 am Post subject: |
|
|
 Grand High Poobah
Joined: 11 Nov 2005 Posts: 26093 Location: Texas, USA
|
zpat wrote: |
I am not talking about fixes causing bugs, I am talking about how many problems are being uncovered in WMQ v7. |
Are there more problems with v7.0.0.0 than with v6.0.0.0? Seriously, I'd not heard that. And more than with v5.0.0.0 (if there had been such a thing)?.
Also does anyone have a handle on scale of problems against (say) Oracle 9 to Oracle 10? Or any other major piece of software changing major version? _________________ Honesty is the best policy.
Insanity is the best defence. |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
exerk |
Posted: Fri Sep 03, 2010 7:00 am Post subject: |
|
|
 Jedi Council
Joined: 02 Nov 2006 Posts: 6339
|
zpat wrote: |
I am not talking about fixes causing bugs, I am talking about how many problems are being uncovered in WMQ v7... |
Despite their size, and testing potential, even IBM cannot test against every possible permutation of configuration and application use; there is always going to be an element of 'fix-on-failure', i.e. when users report issues. _________________ It's puzzling, I don't think I've ever seen anything quite like this before...and it's hard to soar like an eagle when you're surrounded by turkeys. |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
mqjeff |
Posted: Fri Sep 03, 2010 7:03 am Post subject: |
|
|
Grand Master
Joined: 25 Jun 2008 Posts: 17447
|
And again, my point about new features is that, for example, the pub/sub engine is entirely new in MQ v7.
So if there are more Fixes against it, that should be relatively expected compared to things like the Transaction handling processing. |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
zpat |
Posted: Mon Sep 06, 2010 6:31 am Post subject: |
|
|
 Jedi Council
Joined: 19 May 2001 Posts: 5866 Location: UK
|
If you read the "problems fixed " list for the fixpacks, a lot of seem to be against existing function, not new function, because the IBM JMS code has been re-written.
Boeing have produced a largely new aeroplane every few years, but I expect it to be able to fly extremely reliably before customers get into it. |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
|