| |
|
RSS Feed - WebSphere MQ Support
|
RSS Feed - Message Broker Support
|
  |
|
| Difference b/w MQ file transfer edition and MB file nodes |
« View previous topic :: View next topic » |
| Author |
Message
|
| shubha_s |
 Posted: Sun Jul 18, 2010 11:17 pm Post subject: Difference b/w MQ file transfer edition and MB file nodes |
 |
|
Acolyte
Joined: 10 Mar 2009
Posts: 57
|
Hi,
In my current project, we are supposed to use MQ File transfer edition. We are also using MB for integration as MB is an advanced ESB.
I have a question, correct me if am wrong.
Can we use MB provided file transfer nodes instead of this MQ File transfer edition?
Which is better??Which is efficient?? MQ file transfer edition or MB file nodes.
Thanks in advance |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
| zpat |
| Posted: Sun Jul 18, 2010 11:26 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Jedi Council
Joined: 19 May 2001
Posts: 5866
Location: UK
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
| mqjeff |
| Posted: Mon Jul 19, 2010 1:49 am Post subject: |
|
|
Grand Master
Joined: 25 Jun 2008
Posts: 17447
|
Also, of course, Broker 7.0.0.1 now has native MQFTE nodes.
So the picture is even more ... well, there are more choices. |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
| elvis_gn |
| Posted: Mon Jul 19, 2010 3:15 am Post subject: |
|
|
Padawan
Joined: 08 Oct 2004
Posts: 1905
Location: Dubai
|
Hi,
| zpat wrote: |
| MB can be used with FTE, at present there is no special awareness of FTE by MB, but this is likely to change in future releases of MB. |
I didn't quite understand this statement....what is the special awareness required from MB ?
| shubha_s wrote: |
In my current project, we are supposed to use MQ File transfer edition. We are also using MB for integration as MB is an advanced ESB.
I have a question, correct me if am wrong.
Can we use MB provided file transfer nodes instead of this MQ File transfer edition?
Which is better??Which is efficient?? MQ file transfer edition or MB file nodes. |
You cannot use MB *instead* of MQFTE. You will use MB as just another agent in the MQFTE landscape.
MB will not give you the FTE console to configure file transfers between agents, so you will need to purchase FTE (or trade-up). Also, MB will just be 1 agent, you need atleast two to tango, I mean source and destination 
On which is better, definitely MQFTE. It can handle transfers of unlimited quantity of data without clogging bandwidth...imagine sending 1Tb over FTP. There are other benefits, but primary reason to not use FTP nodes would be the reliability and performance.
Its a different discussion on whether I could and how I'd work with 1Tb inside broker.
Regards. |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
| zpat |
| Posted: Mon Jul 19, 2010 4:19 am Post subject: |
|
|
Jedi Council
Joined: 19 May 2001
Posts: 5866
Location: UK
|
| Special awareness means that MB 7.0.0.1 and FTE directly interoperate programmatically, instead of both of them just using the same file directory (indirect). |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
| Amitha |
| Posted: Mon Jul 19, 2010 10:25 am Post subject: |
|
|
Voyager
Joined: 20 Nov 2009
Posts: 80
Location: Newyork
|
| Also, if you are using an earlier version of WMB(6.1 or 6.0, and 7.0 without latest fixpack one ) you can integrate with FTE by sending File transfer command to SYSTEM.FTE.COMMAND.<AgentName>. |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
|
|
|
| |
|
Page 1 of 1 |
|
You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot vote in polls in this forum
|
|
|
|
