ASG
IBM
Zystems
Cressida
Icon
Netflexity
 
  MQSeries.net
Search  Search       Tech Exchange      Education      Certifications      Library      Info Center      SupportPacs      LinkedIn  Search  Search                                                                   FAQ  FAQ   Usergroups  Usergroups
 
Register  ::  Log in Log in to check your private messages
 
RSS Feed - WebSphere MQ Support RSS Feed - Message Broker Support

MQSeries.net Forum Index » General Discussion » Anybody else seen this silly bug in runmqdlq (v6)

Post new topic  Reply to topic
 Anybody else seen this silly bug in runmqdlq (v6) « View previous topic :: View next topic » 
Author Message
dgolding
PostPosted: Wed Feb 24, 2010 3:43 am    Post subject: Anybody else seen this silly bug in runmqdlq (v6) Reply with quote

Yatiri

Joined: 16 May 2001
Posts: 668
Location: Switzerland

Can't see any previous reference to it with Mr. Google, but every time I put MQRC_CLUSTER_RESOLUTION_ERROR in a rules file to be processed by runmqdlq, I get a syntax error. It turns out the name is too long - when I tried MQRC_RESPONSE_RECORDS_ERROR it's fine, any name longer than this gets an error, it seems

Workaround is to put reason(*) to pick up everything
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Visit poster's website
exerk
PostPosted: Wed Feb 24, 2010 3:44 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

Jedi Council

Joined: 02 Nov 2006
Posts: 6339

How about using the numeric for that one?
_________________
It's puzzling, I don't think I've ever seen anything quite like this before...and it's hard to soar like an eagle when you're surrounded by turkeys.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
dgolding
PostPosted: Wed Feb 24, 2010 3:53 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

Yatiri

Joined: 16 May 2001
Posts: 668
Location: Switzerland

Good idea, I always use the mnemonic, didn't know you could use the numeric value - that works fine.

After some experimentation it doesn't seem to be as simple as length of string, some longer strings got acccepted, some shorter ones don't. very strange and inconsistent
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Visit poster's website
mqjeff
PostPosted: Wed Feb 24, 2010 4:59 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

Grand Master

Joined: 25 Jun 2008
Posts: 17447

You might need to use a version of runmqdlq that was compiled in an environment where that MQRC is valid?

I'm guessing you're always using the precompiled runmqdlq from the samples/bin, which should always get updated when you apply an FP... but it's worth double-checking that you're not somehow using an old binary.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Display posts from previous:   
Post new topic  Reply to topic Page 1 of 1

MQSeries.net Forum Index » General Discussion » Anybody else seen this silly bug in runmqdlq (v6)
Jump to:  



You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot vote in polls in this forum
Protected by Anti-Spam ACP
 
 


Theme by Dustin Baccetti
Powered by phpBB © 2001, 2002 phpBB Group

Copyright © MQSeries.net. All rights reserved.