Author |
Message
|
ReedSmith |
Posted: Mon Jan 11, 2010 6:47 am Post subject: duplicate MQ messages without a broker ? |
|
|
Newbie
Joined: 11 Jan 2010 Posts: 2
|
Hi,
I'm new to this forum but i've been reading it for quite a long time now.
I'm working as an IT architect for an automotive manufacturer.
Is there any way to duplicate messages directly in MQ (from one queue to another) without using a broker flow ?
Thanks,
Reed _________________ Success is like being pregnant : everybody congratulates you, but nobody knows how many times you were fu***
Last edited by ReedSmith on Mon Jan 11, 2010 7:38 am; edited 1 time in total |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
nathanw |
Posted: Mon Jan 11, 2010 6:51 am Post subject: |
|
|
 Knight
Joined: 14 Jul 2004 Posts: 550
|
several products out there and user exits etc
mirrorQ springs to mind as does Capital Wares Message Multiplexer _________________ Who is General Failure and why is he reading my hard drive?
Artificial Intelligence stands no chance against Natural Stupidity.
Only the User Trace Speaks The Truth  |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
Vitor |
Posted: Mon Jan 11, 2010 6:57 am Post subject: Re: duplicate MQ messages without a broker ? |
|
|
 Grand High Poobah
Joined: 11 Nov 2005 Posts: 26093 Location: Texas, USA
|
ReedSmith wrote: |
I'm new to this forum but i've been reading it for quite a long time now. |
Then you must have seen some of the previous discussions on this - it's been a popular topic over the years. _________________ Honesty is the best policy.
Insanity is the best defence. |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
Vitor |
Posted: Mon Jan 11, 2010 6:58 am Post subject: |
|
|
 Grand High Poobah
Joined: 11 Nov 2005 Posts: 26093 Location: Texas, USA
|
nathanw wrote: |
mirrorQ springs to mind |
Once again I remind all readers that mirrorq is a sample exit not intended for production use, so it should be reviewed and adapted to local site standards. _________________ Honesty is the best policy.
Insanity is the best defence. |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
nathanw |
Posted: Mon Jan 11, 2010 6:59 am Post subject: |
|
|
 Knight
Joined: 14 Jul 2004 Posts: 550
|
Vitor wrote: |
nathanw wrote: |
mirrorQ springs to mind |
Once again I remind all readers that mirrorq is a sample exit not intended for production use, so it should be reviewed and adapted to local site standards. |
Vitor I agree I was just pointing him in the direction of some examples afterall it is up to him what he uses _________________ Who is General Failure and why is he reading my hard drive?
Artificial Intelligence stands no chance against Natural Stupidity.
Only the User Trace Speaks The Truth  |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
Vitor |
Posted: Mon Jan 11, 2010 7:10 am Post subject: |
|
|
 Grand High Poobah
Joined: 11 Nov 2005 Posts: 26093 Location: Texas, USA
|
nathanw wrote: |
Vitor I agree I was just pointing him in the direction of some examples afterall it is up to him what he uses |
Oh quite, I was simply underlining the point. There is an urban myth that mirrorq is part of the WMQ product and is as reliable as an MCA; I am sworn to quash this.
It's odd that people believe that mirrorq is part of WMQ, given that (as you correctly point out) people sell alternatives to it.
<plug>Including our sponsors</plug>  _________________ Honesty is the best policy.
Insanity is the best defence. |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
ReedSmith |
Posted: Mon Jan 11, 2010 7:43 am Post subject: Re: duplicate MQ messages without a broker ? |
|
|
Newbie
Joined: 11 Jan 2010 Posts: 2
|
Vitor wrote: |
ReedSmith wrote: |
I'm new to this forum but i've been reading it for quite a long time now. |
Then you must have seen some of the previous discussions on this - it's been a popular topic over the years. |
***
I'm sorry I tried a search but my keywords were not so accurate.....
Thanks for answers !
When asking, I had in mind something about copying the messages with some MQ mechanisms.
I now see that using pub/sub can be a workaround.
I'll try to investigate more in this way  _________________ Success is like being pregnant : everybody congratulates you, but nobody knows how many times you were fu*** |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
|