| Author |
Message
|
| akshila |
 Posted: Thu Dec 24, 2009 6:49 am Post subject: MQ unable to create dynamic Q |
 |
|
Newbie
Joined: 24 Dec 2009
Posts: 5
|
Hi Guys,
I am facing a problem here , i am using MQ 6.0.2.2 on Using Centos 5.4.
There are 2 servers that are running on my machine . When i try to open a dynamic q to comunicate between them i am getting below error.
AThreadEnv::CreateSyncSendQueue() - Error: FATAL Dyn Q open ended with reason code 2011
AppMQMsg::syncSend(), error: Cannot create a per-thread syncsend Queue
Can someone please help , tell me the cause of this error. I am stuck at this.
Thank You |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
| Vitor |
| Posted: Thu Dec 24, 2009 7:50 am Post subject: Re: MQ unable to create dynamic Q |
|
|
Grand High Poobah
Joined: 11 Nov 2005
Posts: 26093
Location: Texas, USA
|
| akshila wrote: |
| Can someone please help , tell me the cause of this error. I am stuck at this. |
What does 2011 indicate? What might cause this, given the 2nd message line?
It's also considered rude here to double post, and very rude to hijack other threads as you did here!
You might want to spend a few moments reviewing the "New To Websphere" section that contains (among other things) posting guidelines.
_________________
Honesty is the best policy.
Insanity is the best defence. |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
| akshila |
| Posted: Thu Dec 24, 2009 7:58 am Post subject: |
|
|
Newbie
Joined: 24 Dec 2009
Posts: 5
|
2011 is MQRC_DYNAMIC_Q_NAME_ERROR
There are 2 servers that are up and running , client_hanndler and service_locator. I am trying to extablish dynamic Q from client_handler to service_locator. This is all the error i see.
18:38:19 D07[client_handler-1]: sending the message to service locator
18:38:19 C--[client_handler-1]: AThreadEnv::CreateSyncSendQueue() - Error: FATAL Dyn Q open ended with reason code 2011
18:38:19 C--[client_handler-1]: AppMQMsg::syncSend(), error: Cannot create a per-thread syncsend Queue
18:38:19 D02[client_handler-1]: ClientHandler.C 274 Got the failure response from service_locator
18:38:19 D02[client_handler-1]: Time spent in [ClientMessage] is: 0.001446 seconds |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
| akshila |
| Posted: Thu Dec 24, 2009 8:02 am Post subject: |
|
|
Newbie
Joined: 24 Dec 2009
Posts: 5
|
| Actually the same code was working fine in RH Linux 4. There is no change in the version of MQ used. The only change is the OS. Is there any restriction based on OS ? |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
| akshila |
| Posted: Thu Dec 24, 2009 8:34 am Post subject: |
|
|
Newbie
Joined: 24 Dec 2009
Posts: 5
|
Honestly I dint hijack any thread nor did i double most. U have mistaken.
I will read though the document u mentioned as i am new to this forum
Thank you. |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
| mvic |
| Posted: Thu Dec 24, 2009 9:30 am Post subject: |
|
|
Jedi
Joined: 09 Mar 2004
Posts: 2080
|
| akshila wrote: |
| 2011 is MQRC_DYNAMIC_Q_NAME_ERROR |
The reasons for this code are here http://publib.boulder.ibm.com/infocenter/wmqv7/v7r0/topic/com.ibm.mq.amqzao.doc/fm12180_.htm
It looks as if the code that calls MQOPEN has composed the input parameter block correctly. Has the application owner got involved yet?
Please do make use of the product manuals when you have text or reason codes that can be looked up. It is always the way to begin an investigation.
Last edited by mvic on Thu Dec 24, 2009 9:32 am; edited 1 time in total |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
| Vitor |
| Posted: Thu Dec 24, 2009 9:30 am Post subject: |
|
|
Grand High Poobah
Joined: 11 Nov 2005
Posts: 26093
Location: Texas, USA
|
| akshila wrote: |
| U have mistaken. |
I certainly have! Apologies for that - too much Xmas spirit 
| akshila wrote: |
| I will read though the document u mentioned as i am new to this forum |
It's certainly worth a read; contains a number of helpful tips as well as the guidelines.
Again, apologies for the mix up 
_________________
Honesty is the best policy.
Insanity is the best defence. |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
| akshila |
| Posted: Thu Dec 24, 2009 9:41 am Post subject: |
|
|
Newbie
Joined: 24 Dec 2009
Posts: 5
|
Hi mvic ,
I did go through the reason code. i dont see anything wrong with Q name and moreover the same code is working different machine(different OS)
Q name cant be wrong. Can change in OS cause such issue ? |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
|
|
