| |
|
RSS Feed - WebSphere MQ Support
|
RSS Feed - Message Broker Support
|
  |
|
| Message Flow Between 3 QM and Event ID 2623 |
« View previous topic :: View next topic » |
| Author |
Message
|
| kimzplaze |
 Posted: Wed Sep 16, 2009 8:15 am Post subject: Message Flow Between 3 QM and Event ID 2623 |
 |
|
Newbie
Joined: 16 Sep 2009
Posts: 4
|
Hi all..
I keep getting an error with the event id 2623.
My situation is i got 3 QM. Lets name them A, B and C. B has direct connection with A and C while A will receive messages from C via B and C will receive messages from A via B.
Eg.. A --------- B ---------- C
QM B will play the forwarder role.
When A receive a message sent from C, in the event viewer of A, I will get a error with event id 2623. The message will state that on A, it is unable to open the queue SYSTEM.JMS.REPORT.QUEUE on QM C. Likewise, i will get a similar message on C when it receive a message from QM A.
I am thinking that this is due to JMS trying to send a ACK message to the originator of the message but it has no direct path to it.
In the broker toolkit, I noticed in the workflow of B. In the output node to A and C, under a tab, there is this "Reply to Queue and Reply to Queue Manager". I think this might be the key to solve my problem.
Is it true that, on B's workflow, if i set the reply to queue and reply-to-queuemanager on the outputnodes to A and C, to B QM's name, this problem would be solved? To me, it is like I am telling A and C to reply to B.
Thanks a lot =) |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
| kimzplaze |
| Posted: Wed Sep 16, 2009 3:29 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Newbie
Joined: 16 Sep 2009
Posts: 4
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
| JosephGramig |
| Posted: Thu Sep 17, 2009 4:18 am Post subject: |
|
|
Grand Master
Joined: 09 Feb 2006
Posts: 1244
Location: Gold Coast of Florida, USA
|
| Try an alias QMGR at A and C for each other that point to B. |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
| aditya.aggarwal |
| Posted: Thu Sep 17, 2009 7:00 am Post subject: |
|
|
Master
Joined: 13 Jan 2009
Posts: 252
|
| Quote: |
| Is it true that, on B's workflow, if i set the reply to queue and reply-to-queuemanager on the outputnodes to A and C, to B QM's name, this problem would be solved? |
Yes if you want the acknowldement at application at qmgr B.
Best Solution for this is put qmgr A, B and C in to MQ Cluster and send/recive request-reply messages via Cluster queues.
Cheers,
Aditya |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
| sumit |
| Posted: Thu Sep 17, 2009 7:30 am Post subject: |
|
|
Partisan
Joined: 19 Jan 2006
Posts: 398
|
| aditya.aggarwal wrote: |
| Best Solution for this is put qmgr A, B and C in to MQ Cluster and send/recive request-reply messages via Cluster queues. |
Doesn't seem so in this condition..
| Quote: |
| My situation is i got 3 QM. Lets name them A, B and C. B has direct connection with A and C while A will receive messages from C via B and C will receive messages from A via B. |
I don't think one would go for an overlapped clusters just for 3 qmgrs.
_________________
Regards
Sumit |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
| aditya.aggarwal |
| Posted: Thu Sep 17, 2009 8:06 am Post subject: |
|
|
Master
Joined: 13 Jan 2009
Posts: 252
|
sumit wrote:
| Quote: |
| I don't think one would go for an overlapped clusters just for 3 qmgrs. |
is there only three queue managers in their infrastruture? are you sure?
Best Way to work with Broker components is to put it's qmgrs to a MQ Cluster. So if they are using MQ Cluster with Broker, CMG, UNM qmgrs..
Then it is easy to put qmgr A and qmgr C in to MQ Cluster with qmgr B[Broker qmgr]... |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
| mqjeff |
| Posted: Thu Sep 17, 2009 9:14 am Post subject: |
|
|
Grand Master
Joined: 25 Jun 2008
Posts: 17447
|
| That's only the Best Way if it's the appropriate way. |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
|
|
|
| |
|
Page 1 of 1 |
|
You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot vote in polls in this forum
|
|
|
|
