| Author |
Message
|
| velocity |
 Posted: Tue Sep 08, 2009 6:19 am Post subject: Cluster queues |
 |
|
Centurion
Joined: 30 Nov 2007
Posts: 126
|
Hi Guys - I guess I am a little confused.
Lets say there are 3 QMS A, B, & C in a cluster ABC
There is a clustered local queue called 1.2.3 ONLY on QM B defined to the ABC cluster.
Can I not display the clustered queue from QM A by issuing
DIS QCLUSTER(1.2.3)
For some reason I can only display the queue from QM B. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
| exerk |
| Posted: Tue Sep 08, 2009 6:36 am Post subject: |
|
|
Jedi Council
Joined: 02 Nov 2006
Posts: 6339
|
You'll see it in a Full Repository, but not from a Partial Repository, until it has been referenced. It's all in the manual.
Moving this to the appropriate forum...
_________________
It's puzzling, I don't think I've ever seen anything quite like this before...and it's hard to soar like an eagle when you're surrounded by turkeys. |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
| bruce2359 |
| Posted: Tue Sep 08, 2009 6:59 am Post subject: |
|
|
Poobah
Joined: 05 Jan 2008
Posts: 9469
Location: US: west coast, almost. Otherwise, enroute.
|
The usual narrative is: a full repository knows everything about a cluster; a partial repository only knows what it has expressed interest in.
This means that until an application MQOPENs a clustered queue from a PR, the PR will not know of the queues existence.
_________________
I like deadlines. I like to wave as they pass by.
ב''ה
Lex Orandi, Lex Credendi, Lex Vivendi. As we Worship, So we Believe, So we Live. |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
| sumit |
| Posted: Tue Sep 08, 2009 7:03 am Post subject: |
|
|
Partisan
Joined: 19 Jan 2006
Posts: 398
|
Queue 1.2.3 will not be visible in any of the partial repos (except where it is defined) till you access that queue for put/get.
Use utilities for put/get operation and analyse the result.
_________________
Regards
Sumit |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
| bruce2359 |
| Posted: Tue Sep 08, 2009 7:08 am Post subject: |
|
|
Poobah
Joined: 05 Jan 2008
Posts: 9469
Location: US: west coast, almost. Otherwise, enroute.
|
| Quote: |
| till you access that queue for put/get. |
Discovery from an FR takes place as a result of name resolution. such as MQOPEN or MQPUT1.
_________________
I like deadlines. I like to wave as they pass by.
ב''ה
Lex Orandi, Lex Credendi, Lex Vivendi. As we Worship, So we Believe, So we Live. |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
| gbaddeley |
| Posted: Tue Sep 08, 2009 4:46 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Jedi Knight
Joined: 25 Mar 2003
Posts: 2538
Location: Melbourne, Australia
|
Wow, 4 posts basically said the same thing.
_________________
Glenn |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
| bruce2359 |
| Posted: Tue Sep 08, 2009 6:37 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Poobah
Joined: 05 Jan 2008
Posts: 9469
Location: US: west coast, almost. Otherwise, enroute.
|
| Quote: |
| Wow, 4 posts basically said the same thing. |
Not really. Some clarity was added.
_________________
I like deadlines. I like to wave as they pass by.
ב''ה
Lex Orandi, Lex Credendi, Lex Vivendi. As we Worship, So we Believe, So we Live. |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
| exerk |
| Posted: Tue Sep 08, 2009 11:28 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Jedi Council
Joined: 02 Nov 2006
Posts: 6339
|
| sumit wrote: |
| Queue 1.2.3 will not be visible in any of the partial repos (except where it is defined) till you access that queue for put/get). |
You cannot, cannot GET from an instance of a clustered queue that is not 'local' to the application (and before anyone jumps in with the caveat that you can with client...) and a 'local' GET will not cause that queue to show up in a PR (even if you did use client, before anyone jumps in again).
gbaddeley, fair comment, but sometimes hammering in the knowledge is needed 
_________________
It's puzzling, I don't think I've ever seen anything quite like this before...and it's hard to soar like an eagle when you're surrounded by turkeys. |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
|
|
