ASG
IBM
Zystems
Cressida
Icon
Netflexity
 
  MQSeries.net
Search  Search       Tech Exchange      Education      Certifications      Library      Info Center      SupportPacs      LinkedIn  Search  Search                                                                   FAQ  FAQ   Usergroups  Usergroups
 
Register  ::  Log in Log in to check your private messages
 
RSS Feed - WebSphere MQ Support RSS Feed - Message Broker Support

MQSeries.net Forum Index » General IBM MQ Support » WAS Default Messaging Engine Performance

Post new topic  Reply to topic
 WAS Default Messaging Engine Performance « View previous topic :: View next topic » 
Author Message
flwilliams87
PostPosted: Thu Jul 16, 2009 8:03 am    Post subject: WAS Default Messaging Engine Performance Reply with quote

Acolyte

Joined: 04 Feb 2003
Posts: 66
Location: Chicago, IL
Does anyone have any Experience with using the WAS Default Messaging Engine in WAS 6.1 to communicate with a Queue Manager on the Mainframe? I'm noticing a disparity in the performance of this configuration as opposed to the MQ to MQ configuration. I'm not surprised that MQ to MQ is faster, but I'm trying to figure out where the disparity is on the WAS side and why. Any ideas? Thanks
_________________
IBM Certified WebSphere MQ Administrator
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Display posts from previous:   
Post new topic  Reply to topic Page 1 of 1

MQSeries.net Forum Index » General IBM MQ Support » WAS Default Messaging Engine Performance
Jump to:  



You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot vote in polls in this forum
Protected by Anti-Spam ACP
  
 


Theme by Dustin Baccetti
Powered by phpBB © 2001, 2002 phpBB Group

Copyright © MQSeries.net. All rights reserved.