Posted: Fri Jun 12, 2009 11:28 am Post subject: Background
Acolyte
Joined: 04 Feb 2003 Posts: 66 Location: Chicago, IL
We are replacing MQServer with the WAS6.1 Default Messaging engine. This gives us a more simplistic infrastructure and reduces our licensing cost. But I'm curios as to what some of the drawbacks would be to this design? Any thoughts?? _________________ IBM Certified WebSphere MQ Administrator
Posted: Sat Jun 13, 2009 6:30 am Post subject: Re: Background
Grand High Poobah
Joined: 18 Nov 2003 Posts: 20756 Location: LI,NY
flwilliams87 wrote:
We are replacing MQServer with the WAS6.1 Default Messaging engine. This gives us a more simplistic infrastructure and reduces our licensing cost. But I'm curios as to what some of the drawbacks would be to this design? Any thoughts??
The biggest one is that you need WAS and SIBus to have a JMS Engine... + a DB if you so choose as a persistency store....
So no environment without was... _________________ MQ & Broker admin
Those are valid points- simplistic infrastructure and reduces our licensing cost. Apart from that, are there any Cons if we go for WAS SI bus over MQ ?. Which option does provides good fail over, good performance etc?
You cannot post new topics in this forum You cannot reply to topics in this forum You cannot edit your posts in this forum You cannot delete your posts in this forum You cannot vote in polls in this forum