| Author |
Message
|
| Gama |
 Posted: Tue Dec 16, 2008 8:18 am Post subject: Get "/?wsdl" from WMB6 |
 |
|
Centurion
Joined: 11 Jan 2005
Posts: 103
Location: Portugal
|
hello all,
how can i get the WSDL from WMB6 using iexplore for example?
My webService works fine but i don't have the wsdl. I know thar is possible on WAS, but how can i do this on WMB6?
Thanks and best regards
Gama |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
| mqjeff |
| Posted: Tue Dec 16, 2008 8:40 am Post subject: |
|
|
Grand Master
Joined: 25 Jun 2008
Posts: 17447
|
By writing your flow to return the WSDL when it receives a URL that includes "?wsdl".
Or by storing your wsdl under a different http server environment that understands the "?wsdl" syntax.
There are no other ways to do this in v6. |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
| Gama |
| Posted: Tue Dec 16, 2008 8:48 am Post subject: |
|
|
Centurion
Joined: 11 Jan 2005
Posts: 103
Location: Portugal
|
| mqjeff wrote: |
By writing your flow to return the WSDL when it receives a URL that includes "?wsdl".
Or by storing your wsdl under a different http server environment that understands the "?wsdl" syntax.
There are no other ways to do this in v6. |
Whe need to return the wsdl when receive a URL that includes "?wsdl".
Thaks for your fast answer. |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
| broker_new |
| Posted: Tue Dec 16, 2008 11:06 am Post subject: |
|
|
Yatiri
Joined: 30 Nov 2006
Posts: 614
Location: Washington DC
|
Guys,
Remember one thing exposing a web service in broker is a challenging task.
Even after deploying the IE01 proxy servlet on HTTP server doesn't seems to be promising to show significant concurent sessions for a client to call the service.
We have tested exposing the webservice deployed on appserver vs broker,
and tested using a LoadRunner by creating 1000 concurrent sessions appserver was more efficient that Broker.
Atlast it all depends on the requirements, if load is two small go for broker
_________________
IBM ->Let's build a smarter planet |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
| kimbert |
| Posted: Tue Dec 16, 2008 2:26 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Jedi Council
Joined: 29 Jul 2003
Posts: 5542
Location: Southampton
|
broker_new: I'm not sure what your post was trying to say. It doesn't seem to be connected with the question which Gama asked.
Are you asking for suggestions on how to get better performance with your broker-based web service processing?
| Quote: |
| appserver was more efficient that Broker |
You should add 'for the web services which were tested, on the hardware under test, with those versions of broker and appserver'. Other users may find the opposite is true. |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
|
|
