|
RSS Feed - WebSphere MQ Support
|
RSS Feed - Message Broker Support
|
 |
|
Bar files |
« View previous topic :: View next topic » |
Author |
Message
|
vadivel |
Posted: Mon Nov 24, 2008 4:38 am Post subject: Bar files |
|
|
 Voyager
Joined: 05 Aug 2002 Posts: 79 Location: US
|
Hi,
It may not be technical question. We are working on a offshore-onsite model and both the teams access the same dev broker to deploy the code and test it in the dev server.
We are still using MB 5, and our configuration process is not working very well for us.
Is there a way to capture the bar file used for every deployment in the config manager/broker and store it somewhere?
Right now both the teams use toolkit to connect to the broker running in AIX (Config manger in Windows) to deploy the flows and not often does the developers checkin the bar to the configuration management tool before deployment and we have problems post deployment for migration to other environments etc.
I hope you would've faced similar issues. Your suggestions on the process to be followed are most welcome.
Thanks in advance
Vadivel |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
mqjeff |
Posted: Mon Nov 24, 2008 4:55 am Post subject: |
|
|
Grand Master
Joined: 25 Jun 2008 Posts: 17447
|
No, there isn't really a way to capture the bar file instream with the ConfigMgr deployment process.
You must do this with procedures and not with code. A simple procedure is to require that the BAR file that has passed development testing *is* checked into the repository before being deployed anywhere else, and then ensure that your deployment processes for QA/UAT/etc/PROD all start with "check the bar file out of the repository". |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
elvis_gn |
Posted: Mon Nov 24, 2008 5:19 am Post subject: |
|
|
 Padawan
Joined: 08 Oct 2004 Posts: 1905 Location: Dubai
|
Hi all,
mqjeff: It would be possible to prevent the developers from deploying anything onto the broker right ? vadivel could then use the ant scripting to be the only sole means of deployment onto the broker, and the script would pick files only from the CVS repository.
That would teach the buggers to first upload their flows into cvs
Regards. |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
Vitor |
Posted: Mon Nov 24, 2008 5:25 am Post subject: |
|
|
 Grand High Poobah
Joined: 11 Nov 2005 Posts: 26093 Location: Texas, USA
|
elvis_gn wrote: |
mqjeff: It would be possible to prevent the developers from deploying anything onto the broker right ? vadivel could then use the ant scripting to be the only sole means of deployment onto the broker, and the script would pick files only from the CVS repository. |
Alternatively, if this is considered too presecriptive (and I don't, I've just worked on sites where it was) you could automate the build & deploy using ant on a 30 / 60 min cycle. This means that you could still deploy something for testing, but it would be overwritten by the official version automattically unless it was placed in cvs.
elvis_gn wrote: |
That would teach the buggers to first upload their flows into cvs |
Education is always a good answer. Just sometimes it's not a plausible one. _________________ Honesty is the best policy.
Insanity is the best defence. |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
vadivel |
Posted: Mon Nov 24, 2008 10:39 pm Post subject: |
|
|
 Voyager
Joined: 05 Aug 2002 Posts: 79 Location: US
|
Hi all,
Thanks for all your suggestions. I've used mqsideploy in MB6, does it really work with MB5 as well?
And we are using clearcase as our configuration management tool, are there any plugins available for automating this deployment process?
Thanks,
Vadivel |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
|
|
 |
|
Page 1 of 1 |
|
You cannot post new topics in this forum You cannot reply to topics in this forum You cannot edit your posts in this forum You cannot delete your posts in this forum You cannot vote in polls in this forum
|
|
|
|