ASG
IBM
Zystems
Cressida
Icon
Netflexity
 
  MQSeries.net
Search  Search       Tech Exchange      Education      Certifications      Library      Info Center      SupportPacs      LinkedIn  Search  Search                                                                   FAQ  FAQ   Usergroups  Usergroups
 
Register  ::  Log in Log in to check your private messages
 
RSS Feed - WebSphere MQ Support RSS Feed - Message Broker Support

MQSeries.net Forum Index » WebSphere Message Broker (ACE) Support » MB and adapters in transaction

Post new topic  Reply to topic
 MB and adapters in transaction « View previous topic :: View next topic » 
Author Message
Monk
PostPosted: Tue Aug 04, 2009 10:03 pm    Post subject: MB and adapters in transaction Reply with quote

Master

Joined: 21 Apr 2007
Posts: 282

Hi All,

I have a following architecture ,
Front ends (COM based ) -> COM WBI adapter -> Message broker/ MQ -> Database(Oracle/SQL)

question
Can COM WBI adapter be a part of a global transaction?.
i.e if there is say a money transfer request from one account to another and this request is coming from Front end systems. Can the WBI adapter be a part of the transaction?
if it fails or crashes during the global transaction ? what will be the consequences?


Note : By global transaction i mean 2PC. Am i correct here?
Thanks.
_________________
Thimk
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
WMBDEV1
PostPosted: Wed Aug 05, 2009 12:03 am    Post subject: Re: MB and adapters in transaction Reply with quote

Sentinel

Joined: 05 Mar 2009
Posts: 888
Location: UK

Monk wrote:
Hi All,
if it fails or crashes during the global transaction ? what will be the consequences?


In 2PC, either all resuorces will be committed or all resources will be rolled back, depending exactly where in the transaction the failure occurs. But the point about 2PC is that all resources are / will be as they should be according the outcome of the global transaction.

Quote:

Note : By global transaction i mean 2PC. Am i correct here?


Works with me.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
fjb_saper
PostPosted: Wed Aug 05, 2009 2:47 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

Grand High Poobah

Joined: 18 Nov 2003
Posts: 20756
Location: LI,NY

Think also about asynchronous decoupled systems and the need for a compensating transaction.
_________________
MQ & Broker admin
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail
Monk
PostPosted: Wed Aug 05, 2009 2:50 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

Master

Joined: 21 Apr 2007
Posts: 282

Quote:
asynchronous decoupled systems and the need for a compensating transaction.


Can you please elaborate on this..
may be some links/books to read on this kind of stuff..
_________________
Thimk
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
fjb_saper
PostPosted: Wed Aug 05, 2009 2:57 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

Grand High Poobah

Joined: 18 Nov 2003
Posts: 20756
Location: LI,NY

Well, let's say you have a biztalk service and an MQ service involved in the same transaction. Your MQ message is not committed unless you create a separate transaction for it. So if your global transaction needs to take action depending on the result of either the MQ or the biztalk side of the transaction you may need to rollback the part of the transaction that was successful.

This cannot be done without a compensating transaction because the branch that was successful is already committed...
_________________
MQ & Broker admin
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail
Monk
PostPosted: Wed Aug 05, 2009 3:10 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

Master

Joined: 21 Apr 2007
Posts: 282

Quote:

This cannot be done without a compensating transaction because the branch that was successful is already committed...


So , How would I go about designing something like this and what are the things i need to factor in?

Some links related to MQ/MB would be nice..

Btw fjb_saper..you caught me, I was wondering when the poobahs would catch me..

_________________
Thimk
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
WMBDEV1
PostPosted: Wed Aug 05, 2009 3:17 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

Sentinel

Joined: 05 Mar 2009
Posts: 888
Location: UK

Monk wrote:
So , How would I go about designing something like this and what are the things i need to factor in?


This is application specific. The compensating transaction will provide the logic to undo the specific thing that was done. For example if you created an account and wish to roll this back, the compensating transaction would implement / invoke the logic to delete the account.


Last edited by WMBDEV1 on Wed Aug 05, 2009 5:00 am; edited 1 time in total
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Monk
PostPosted: Wed Aug 05, 2009 3:23 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

Master

Joined: 21 Apr 2007
Posts: 282

Quote:
This is application specific. The compensating transaction will provide the logic to undo the specific thing that was done. For example if you created an account and wish to roll this back, the compensating transaction would implement / invoke the logic to delete the account.



Ahhhh I see now
_________________
Thimk
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Monk
PostPosted: Wed Aug 05, 2009 3:25 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

Master

Joined: 21 Apr 2007
Posts: 282

Quote:
This is application specific. The compensating transaction will provide the logic to undo the specific thing that was done. For example if you created an account and wish to roll this back, the compensating transaction would implement / invoke the logic to delete the account.


So can i put this logic in Message broker or is it a bad idea?
_________________
Thimk
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
fjb_saper
PostPosted: Wed Aug 05, 2009 3:41 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

Grand High Poobah

Joined: 18 Nov 2003
Posts: 20756
Location: LI,NY

Generally a bad idea to try to locate this function somewhere.
You were looking at a multiphase commit. This would have been coordinated by some global transaction coordinator. Well the coordination here needs to happen at the next level. If you look at the standard ESB functionality you look most probably at a BPEL / orchestration and this is where the compensating transactions should be defined and executed if need be.

Have fun
_________________
MQ & Broker admin
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail
Monk
PostPosted: Thu Aug 06, 2009 1:22 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

Master

Joined: 21 Apr 2007
Posts: 282

Quote:
You were looking at a multiphase commit. This would have been coordinated by some global transaction coordinator. Well the coordination here needs to happen at the next level. If you look at the standard ESB functionality you look most probably at a BPEL / orchestration and this is where the compensating transactions should be defined and executed if need be.


Can I use Websphere Process server for this kind of thing?
_________________
Thimk
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
WMBDEV1
PostPosted: Thu Aug 06, 2009 1:53 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

Sentinel

Joined: 05 Mar 2009
Posts: 888
Location: UK

Quote:

Can I use Websphere Process server for this kind of thing?


Absolutely, it will orchestrate the need to perform the compensating transaction (although probably wont implement the actual logic to undo the work!)
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Monk
PostPosted: Sun Aug 09, 2009 8:58 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Master

Joined: 21 Apr 2007
Posts: 282

I have only one issue with using W Process server.

whenever we used it in production , it throws heap dumps..and its still not reliable and stable, probably until IBM fixes all the issues, I cant use it.

Is there any other product of IBM that can do the compensating transactions apart from WPS.

Thanks.
_________________
Thimk
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
fjb_saper
PostPosted: Sun Aug 09, 2009 9:19 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Grand High Poobah

Joined: 18 Nov 2003
Posts: 20756
Location: LI,NY

Monk wrote:
I have only one issue with using W Process server.

whenever we used it in production , it throws heap dumps..and its still not reliable and stable, probably until IBM fixes all the issues, I cant use it.

Is there any other product of IBM that can do the compensating transactions apart from WPS.

Thanks.

You can try to develop a WMB flow but it will be more complicated.
This should really belong into the BPEL realm i.e. WPS. Get with IBM and submit them the PMRs...
_________________
MQ & Broker admin
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail
Monk
PostPosted: Sun Aug 09, 2009 9:40 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Master

Joined: 21 Apr 2007
Posts: 282

Hi,

fjb_saper : I also have adapters for COM involved in my architecture.

In my experience, using adapters is generally a bad idea in a critical transaction , even with HA, however for a normal enquiry , its ok.

How would using Web services work in a critical transaction in place of adapters. Would it be a good thing to do?
_________________
Thimk
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Display posts from previous:   
Post new topic  Reply to topic Page 1 of 1

MQSeries.net Forum Index » WebSphere Message Broker (ACE) Support » MB and adapters in transaction
Jump to:  



You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot vote in polls in this forum
Protected by Anti-Spam ACP
 
 


Theme by Dustin Baccetti
Powered by phpBB © 2001, 2002 phpBB Group

Copyright © MQSeries.net. All rights reserved.