| |
|
RSS Feed - WebSphere MQ Support
|
RSS Feed - Message Broker Support
|
  |
|
| Proper implimentation of SVRCONN channels |
« View previous topic :: View next topic » |
| Author |
Message
|
| Bill57 |
 Posted: Thu Aug 01, 2002 11:10 am Post subject: Proper implimentation of SVRCONN channels |
 |
|
Apprentice
Joined: 26 Jul 2002
Posts: 35
Location: Atlanta, GA
|
I took a look at a queue manager today that had several SVRCONN channels defined to support client connections from external customers. The current administrator of that queue manager is making a new definition every time a new customer needs a client connection.
Would a better solution be to set up say, 5 SVRCONN channels, and distribute them amoung the client based customers? Any white papers out there that discuss the "ins and outs" of determining the best solution in reguard to SVRCONN channel set ups?
Thanks
Bill
_________________
Bill Anderson
MQSeries Developer |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
| kingsley |
| Posted: Thu Aug 01, 2002 8:14 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Disciple
Joined: 30 Sep 2001
Posts: 175
Location: Hursley
|
It is a critical solution
If you are expecting mimimal to moderate traffic from every client to Server, then it would be better to share the Channels
If you are expecting Maximum Traffic and that too very huge, it would be wise to create different channels on Different ports so that there wont be any congestion as MQSeries Server internally uses Threads for Balancing job Schedule
Also for each kind of Traffic say from Very High Security to Low Security Data, each kind of traffic can be sent on a different channel so that we can implement various measures on different channels as and when necessary including SSL, Auditing and the like.
How ever, till now , there are no ground thumb rules. Organisations implement based on various factors.
I hope you have weigh so many factors in this regard. |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
| Bill57 |
| Posted: Fri Aug 02, 2002 5:33 am Post subject: Thanks |
|
|
Apprentice
Joined: 26 Jul 2002
Posts: 35
Location: Atlanta, GA
|
Thanks for your advice Kalyan. One thing I had not considered was the use of seperate channels to provide different levels of security. I understood that blindly creating new definitions was a mistake, but I had never really considered the issue in great detail. You helped me focus a great deal better!
Thanks!
Bill
_________________
Bill Anderson
MQSeries Developer |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
|
|
|
| |
|
Page 1 of 1 |
|
You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot vote in polls in this forum
|
|
|
|
