ASG
IBM
Zystems
Cressida
Icon
Netflexity
 
  MQSeries.net
Search  Search       Tech Exchange      Education      Certifications      Library      Info Center      SupportPacs      LinkedIn  Search  Search                                                                   FAQ  FAQ   Usergroups  Usergroups
 
Register  ::  Log in Log in to check your private messages
 
RSS Feed - WebSphere MQ Support RSS Feed - Message Broker Support

MQSeries.net Forum Index » General Discussion » IBM finally admits linear logging sucks

Post new topic  Reply to topic Goto page 1, 2  Next
 IBM finally admits linear logging sucks « View previous topic :: View next topic » 
Author Message
dgolding
PostPosted: Thu Jul 31, 2008 2:57 am    Post subject: IBM finally admits linear logging sucks Reply with quote

Yatiri

Joined: 16 May 2001
Posts: 668
Location: Switzerland

From the MQ best practices page (Link here):


Quote:
A common misconception in the MQ community is that linear logging is more appropriate for production-level systems. In addition to the circular logging benefits, linear logging only incrementally provides object-recovery abilities, and it comes with the cost of regular maintenance to prevent file systems from filling. If the MS03 SupportPac is set up to run regularly, a copy of objects can be replayed from those scripts, minimizing the need for linear logging. Circular-logging queue managers require less maintenance and have less risk of crashing due to using up disk space.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Visit poster's website
Mr Butcher
PostPosted: Thu Jul 31, 2008 4:27 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

Padawan

Joined: 23 May 2005
Posts: 1716

no linear logging, no media recovery. what really s*cks always depends on what you need or not.
_________________
Regards, Butcher
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
fjb_saper
PostPosted: Thu Jul 31, 2008 6:47 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

Grand High Poobah

Joined: 18 Nov 2003
Posts: 20756
Location: LI,NY

Mr Butcher wrote:
no linear logging, no media recovery. what really s*cks always depends on what you need or not.

I believe the question here is can you afford to loose all the messages on a damaged queue, or does your app mandate you to recover the object...

Remember that loosing object recovery from media (linear logging) breaks the assured delivery paradigm.

Enjoy
_________________
MQ & Broker admin
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail
mlr
PostPosted: Thu Jul 31, 2008 12:53 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Novice

Joined: 29 Jun 2008
Posts: 13

i think that should be lose...

loose is the opposite of tight
lose is the opposite of find

why is this such a common error in postings?

others are: teh (typo), could of for could have (illiterate)

any more for any more?
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
bruce2359
PostPosted: Thu Jul 31, 2008 1:23 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Poobah

Joined: 05 Jan 2008
Posts: 9469
Location: US: west coast, almost. Otherwise, enroute.

Skipping over the issue of loose vs lose...[EDIT] vs. Lucy, I'm home!.

Media recovery seems like a mixed blessing. I ponder whether logging messages to the log AND recording media images to the log doesn't put all our mission-critical message eggs in one single-point-of-failure basket.

As an example: I'm logging 100meg messages; I then record the queue image to the log, Voila! (pronounced wah-lah) lots of log segments.

For clients (people, not applications), I suggest that for messages that reside in queues for batch processing, perhaps writing an application that browses the messages and writes them to a sequential file (or whatever) might be a better career-saving methodology.

Did I offer any language correction opportunities?
_________________
I like deadlines. I like to wave as they pass by.
ב''ה
Lex Orandi, Lex Credendi, Lex Vivendi. As we Worship, So we Believe, So we Live.


Last edited by bruce2359 on Thu Jul 31, 2008 1:49 pm; edited 1 time in total
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
mqjeff
PostPosted: Thu Jul 31, 2008 1:46 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Grand Master

Joined: 25 Jun 2008
Posts: 17447

I never like to contemplate what happens if SYSTEM.CLUSTER.REPOSITORY.QUEUE gets media damage.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
PeterPotkay
PostPosted: Tue Aug 05, 2008 11:23 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

Poobah

Joined: 15 May 2001
Posts: 7722

Nowadays (storage technology gets better, average MQ admin skill going down), I wonder what's more likely:

Media failure, or linear logs not maintained properly.
_________________
Peter Potkay
Keep Calm and MQ On
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Michael Dag
PostPosted: Tue Aug 05, 2008 11:41 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

Jedi Knight

Joined: 13 Jun 2002
Posts: 2607
Location: The Netherlands (Amsterdam)

PeterPotkay wrote:
Nowadays (storage technology gets better, average MQ admin skill going down), I wonder what's more likely:

Media failure, or linear logs not maintained properly.


I experienced some damaged objects lately at a new customer location.
Fortunately the data could be retrieved from another place (always a good option!!! ),
turns out large file support was not on for the file system and every now and then the Q file got corrupted...
It should be fixed now, but it does make you panic for a moment... as with
circular logs there is nothing you can do to recover the object's data....
_________________
Michael



MQSystems Facebook page
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Visit poster's website MSN Messenger
mqjeff
PostPosted: Tue Aug 05, 2008 11:44 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

Grand Master

Joined: 25 Jun 2008
Posts: 17447

Michael Dag wrote:
PeterPotkay wrote:
Nowadays (storage technology gets better, average MQ admin skill going down), I wonder what's more likely:

Media failure, or linear logs not maintained properly.


I experienced some damaged objects lately at a new customer location.
Fortunately the data could be retrieved from another place (always a good option!!! ),
turns out large file support was not on for the file system and every now and then the Q file got corrupted...
It should be fixed now, but it does make you panic for a moment... as with
circular logs there is nothing you can do to recover the object's data....


Yes... Clearly Peter forgot to account for "average storage admin skill going down"...
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
bruce2359
PostPosted: Tue Aug 05, 2008 11:46 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

Poobah

Joined: 05 Jan 2008
Posts: 9469
Location: US: west coast, almost. Otherwise, enroute.

In a real world, the likelihood of media failure OR a runaway application filling the logs or linear logs not maintained properly or average MQ admin skill going down, are low, unless it happens to you; then the likelihood is very high.
_________________
I like deadlines. I like to wave as they pass by.
ב''ה
Lex Orandi, Lex Credendi, Lex Vivendi. As we Worship, So we Believe, So we Live.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
PeterPotkay
PostPosted: Tue Aug 05, 2008 11:51 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

Poobah

Joined: 15 May 2001
Posts: 7722

Touché Jeff

Although if the SAN guy ain't got no clue, I doubt its just 1 queue getting damaged. The whole QM is gone.

No storage admins, good or otherwise, are involved if you are running on local mirrored disks, though.
_________________
Peter Potkay
Keep Calm and MQ On
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
PeterPotkay
PostPosted: Tue Aug 05, 2008 11:59 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

Poobah

Joined: 15 May 2001
Posts: 7722

bruce2359 wrote:
In a real world, the likelihood of media failure OR a runaway application filling the logs or linear logs not maintained properly or average MQ admin skill going down, are low, unless it happens to you; then the likelihood is very high.

The most oddball, extremely rare problem is a big deal when it hits you.

You gotta weigh all the pros and cons when deciding between logging types, and don't forget to factor in technology moving forward.

People tend to be passionate about this topic in general.
_________________
Peter Potkay
Keep Calm and MQ On
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
falconX
PostPosted: Tue Aug 05, 2008 12:27 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Novice

Joined: 04 Sep 2007
Posts: 18

PeterPotkay wrote:
Nowadays (storage technology gets better, average MQ admin skill going down), I wonder what's more likely:

Media failure, or linear logs not maintained properly.


we are still wondring which is more likely
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Michael Dag
PostPosted: Tue Aug 05, 2008 12:58 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Jedi Knight

Joined: 13 Jun 2002
Posts: 2607
Location: The Netherlands (Amsterdam)

PeterPotkay wrote:
People tend to be passionate about this topic in general.

holy wars?

I gave up and just deal with it the way it is.
I try to keep things as simple as possible (circular) and point out the 'risks' ...
this last incident blindsided me as I was just in for a day and the Q file got corrupted (uh oh... )
Luck was on my side and the data was also somewhere else... but it could have been different...
_________________
Michael



MQSystems Facebook page
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Visit poster's website MSN Messenger
bruce2359
PostPosted: Tue Aug 05, 2008 3:36 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Poobah

Joined: 05 Jan 2008
Posts: 9469
Location: US: west coast, almost. Otherwise, enroute.

Quote:
I try to keep things as simple as possible (circular) and point out the 'risks'

If something is inevitable or likely, warning someone ahead of time doesn't keep them from complaining bitterly when it occurs; or fingering you for an ineffective warning.

I usually look to what I can manage, and what I can't. I can't manage how programmers write their code; but I can manage (buy, write) some automation that will archive inactive log segments as they occur.
_________________
I like deadlines. I like to wave as they pass by.
ב''ה
Lex Orandi, Lex Credendi, Lex Vivendi. As we Worship, So we Believe, So we Live.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Display posts from previous:   
Post new topic  Reply to topic Goto page 1, 2  Next Page 1 of 2

MQSeries.net Forum Index » General Discussion » IBM finally admits linear logging sucks
Jump to:  



You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot vote in polls in this forum
Protected by Anti-Spam ACP
 
 


Theme by Dustin Baccetti
Powered by phpBB © 2001, 2002 phpBB Group

Copyright © MQSeries.net. All rights reserved.