| Author |
Message
|
| carolhara |
 Posted: Wed Feb 13, 2008 11:07 am Post subject: Sender Channel Initializing |
 |
|
Acolyte
Joined: 02 Oct 2007
Posts: 56
|
Tried to start a sender channel but it stays initializing forever. I don´t even get a single error on event viewer. Not even that the channel is starting or something.
Listeners are fine and I already restarted the qms.
Queue Managers on the same machine
Mq 5.3
Windows 2000
Please help. Thanks. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
| EddieA |
| Posted: Wed Feb 13, 2008 12:44 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Jedi
Joined: 28 Jun 2001
Posts: 2453
Location: Los Angeles
|
The errors would be logged in the <install dir>\errors or <install dir>\qmgrs\<qmgr>\errors directory.
Cheers,
_________________
Eddie Atherton
IBM Certified Solution Developer - WebSphere Message Broker V6.1
IBM Certified Solution Developer - WebSphere Message Broker V7.0 |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
| carolhara |
| Posted: Thu Feb 14, 2008 4:19 am Post subject: |
|
|
Acolyte
Joined: 02 Oct 2007
Posts: 56
|
Still, nothing logged. Last error message occurred 3pm yet I started starting the channels at almost 5pm.
Today they were all inactive so I tried starting them. Twelve channels started immediately but from 13th upwards got initializing.
At least I got message 9002 for the channels that started ok. But for this 13th and so on nothing has appeared.
I actually searched the forum for an issue like this but the one I´ve found happend in a Solaris platform... still the tips didn´t help at all.
Any ideas??? Thank you. |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
| carolhara |
| Posted: Thu Feb 14, 2008 4:27 am Post subject: |
|
|
Acolyte
Joined: 02 Oct 2007
Posts: 56
|
After 20 minutes i had started 13th and 14th, i got messages 'channel is starting' and 'channel ended normally'. Now they´re inactive.
Tried to start it... Initializing again. |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
| Vitor |
| Posted: Thu Feb 14, 2008 4:28 am Post subject: Re: Sender Channel Initializing |
|
|
Grand High Poobah
Joined: 11 Nov 2005
Posts: 26093
Location: Texas, USA
|
| carolhara wrote: |
Mq 5.3
Windows 2000
|
Old OS - what CSD are you patched to?
It sounds like you're running out of resource someplace & Windoze isn't signalling it properly. Especially with that number of queue managers on a single box!
#include <standard Windoze rant>
_________________
Honesty is the best policy.
Insanity is the best defence. |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
| carolhara |
| Posted: Thu Feb 14, 2008 4:36 am Post subject: Re: Sender Channel Initializing |
|
|
Acolyte
Joined: 02 Oct 2007
Posts: 56
|
| Vitor wrote: |
| carolhara wrote: |
Mq 5.3
Windows 2000
|
Old OS - what CSD are you patched to?
It sounds like you're running out of resource someplace & Windoze isn't signalling it properly. Especially with that number of queue managers on a single box!
#include <standard Windoze rant>
|
Thanks for replying. CSD12
We´re using 2 queue managers. |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
| Vitor |
| Posted: Thu Feb 14, 2008 5:11 am Post subject: Re: Sender Channel Initializing |
|
|
Grand High Poobah
Joined: 11 Nov 2005
Posts: 26093
Location: Texas, USA
|
| carolhara wrote: |
| We´re using 2 queue managers. |
2 queue managers. And 14 channels.....? 
_________________
Honesty is the best policy.
Insanity is the best defence. |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
| Vitor |
| Posted: Thu Feb 14, 2008 5:14 am Post subject: Re: Sender Channel Initializing |
|
|
Grand High Poobah
Joined: 11 Nov 2005
Posts: 26093
Location: Texas, USA
|
| Vitor wrote: |
| 2 queue managers. And 14 channels.....? |
They don't all point to each other do they...... 
That vending machine is NOT dispensing decaff coffee as advertised! Mineral water for me for the rest of the day.
I'd still guess you're running out of space, possible for the TCP/IP stack.
_________________
Honesty is the best policy.
Insanity is the best defence. |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
| jefflowrey |
| Posted: Thu Feb 14, 2008 5:24 am Post subject: |
|
|
Grand Poobah
Joined: 16 Oct 2002
Posts: 19981
|
how much RAM? How many other proccesses running on same box?
_________________
I am *not* the model of the modern major general. |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
| carolhara |
| Posted: Thu Feb 14, 2008 5:36 am Post subject: |
|
|
Acolyte
Joined: 02 Oct 2007
Posts: 56
|
haha 69 sender channels plus 69 receiver channels within each of these 2 queue managers.
I won´t dare to tell you how much RAM... I´m ashamed.
Thanks. |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
| Vitor |
| Posted: Thu Feb 14, 2008 5:38 am Post subject: |
|
|
Grand High Poobah
Joined: 11 Nov 2005
Posts: 26093
Location: Texas, USA
|
| carolhara wrote: |
| 69 sender channels plus 69 receiver channels within each of these 2 queue managers. |
Now that's what I call a topology!
(Other descriptions than "topology" may be valid.....)
_________________
Honesty is the best policy.
Insanity is the best defence. |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
| bruce2359 |
| Posted: Thu Feb 14, 2008 5:57 am Post subject: |
|
|
Poobah
Joined: 05 Jan 2008
Posts: 9469
Location: US: west coast, almost. Otherwise, enroute.
|
OK. This is a joke, isn't it?
_________________
I like deadlines. I like to wave as they pass by.
ב''ה
Lex Orandi, Lex Credendi, Lex Vivendi. As we Worship, So we Believe, So we Live. |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
| jefflowrey |
| Posted: Thu Feb 14, 2008 5:59 am Post subject: |
|
|
Grand Poobah
Joined: 16 Oct 2002
Posts: 19981
|
| bruce2359 wrote: |
| OK. This is a joke, isn't it? |
Yes.
The only question is if it's on us, or on carolhara
_________________
I am *not* the model of the modern major general. |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
| carolhara |
| Posted: Thu Feb 14, 2008 7:32 am Post subject: |
|
|
Acolyte
Joined: 02 Oct 2007
Posts: 56
|
I´m serious. We are simulating the production environment in this poor machine so if it works there we won´t have problems in a better one.
Now we decided to use the second queue manager in a remote computer. |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
| jefflowrey |
| Posted: Thu Feb 14, 2008 7:40 am Post subject: |
|
|
Grand Poobah
Joined: 16 Oct 2002
Posts: 19981
|
This is like trying to haul 1,000 lbs of cargo on your pedal bike, with the assumption that if you can do it there, then you won't have any trouble doing it on your flatbed truck.
Most of what you're hoping to discover may not be accurate against production.
I remember some odd things about Windows networking and MQ v5.3 and registry entries when it came to starting up "lots of channels" on Windows.
I don't remember the details, or what constituted "lots" of channels.
_________________
I am *not* the model of the modern major general. |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
|
|
