| Author |
Message
|
| nab054371 |
 Posted: Wed Jan 23, 2008 5:22 am Post subject: Transmission Queue Name |
 |
|
Disciple
Joined: 15 Nov 2006
Posts: 173
|
Hi,
Just a quick question:
Should the transmission queue Name match up with remote queue manager name?
In other words,if I have a remote queue manager say MQDEV,should the transmission queue name be MQDEV?
thanks |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
| nab054371 |
| Posted: Wed Jan 23, 2008 5:24 am Post subject: |
|
|
Disciple
Joined: 15 Nov 2006
Posts: 173
|
| Sorry,looks like I answered my own question ,its NO |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
| Vitor |
| Posted: Wed Jan 23, 2008 5:28 am Post subject: |
|
|
Grand High Poobah
Joined: 11 Nov 2005
Posts: 26093
Location: Texas, USA
|
| nab054371 wrote: |
| Sorry,looks like I answered my own question ,its NO |
Really? 
On what do you base this? 
Is this connected to this: http://www.mqseries.net/phpBB2/viewtopic.php?p=191193 and if so, your site has some seriously funky routing standards.
_________________
Honesty is the best policy.
Insanity is the best defence. |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
| jefflowrey |
| Posted: Wed Jan 23, 2008 5:32 am Post subject: |
|
|
Grand Poobah
Joined: 16 Oct 2002
Posts: 19981
|
There isn't a yes or no answer here.
It is "Yes, it should match if you want to do X", and "No, it should not match if you want to do Y".
X, however, may be preferable to most people than Y.
_________________
I am *not* the model of the modern major general. |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
| Vitor |
| Posted: Wed Jan 23, 2008 5:35 am Post subject: |
|
|
Grand High Poobah
Joined: 11 Nov 2005
Posts: 26093
Location: Texas, USA
|
| jefflowrey wrote: |
| X, however, may be preferable to most people than Y. |
Less typing, more routing 
_________________
Honesty is the best policy.
Insanity is the best defence. |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
| bruce2359 |
| Posted: Wed Jan 23, 2008 9:29 am Post subject: |
|
|
Poobah
Joined: 05 Jan 2008
Posts: 9469
Location: US: west coast, almost. Otherwise, enroute.
|
There is no requirement for naming any MQ object - other than A-Z, a-z, dot, slask, percent, underscore. The name should be meaningful to you. Or not; as you choose.
Naming the transmission queue the same name as the queue manager at the other end of the channel makes it easier to understand, and easier to do problem determination. It's one of those "best practices" we chat about.
_________________
I like deadlines. I like to wave as they pass by.
ב''ה
Lex Orandi, Lex Credendi, Lex Vivendi. As we Worship, So we Believe, So we Live. |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
| EddieA |
| Posted: Wed Jan 23, 2008 10:34 am Post subject: |
|
|
Jedi
Joined: 28 Jun 2001
Posts: 2453
Location: Los Angeles
|
| bruce2359 wrote: |
| Naming the transmission queue the same name as the queue manager at the other end of the channel makes it easier to understand, and easier to do problem determination. It's one of those "best practices" we chat about. |
It also makes multi-hop messaging easier.
Cheers,
_________________
Eddie Atherton
IBM Certified Solution Developer - WebSphere Message Broker V6.1
IBM Certified Solution Developer - WebSphere Message Broker V7.0 |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
| jefflowrey |
| Posted: Wed Jan 23, 2008 10:36 am Post subject: |
|
|
Grand Poobah
Joined: 16 Oct 2002
Posts: 19981
|
| EddieA wrote: |
| It also makes multi-hop messaging easier. |
And COA/COD/Reply delivery easier...
_________________
I am *not* the model of the modern major general. |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
|
|
