Posted: Wed Oct 24, 2007 8:08 am Post subject: High Availability & Fail over
Partisan
Joined: 06 Jun 2004 Posts: 316
We are planning on implementing HA solution for our MQ environment to acheive failover of queue manager. Apart from reduced operating costs, does active-standby configuration buy us anything more over active-active configuration. Please suggest me the pros and cons of the two available configurations.
Thanks Jeff. In general, What would be the restart time difference between the two configurations. i.e time taken by passive system to take over failed system in active/passive config and time taken by active system to take over failed system in active/active config.
Its the same thing. A QM can only run on one node. Its gonna take the same amount of time for QM1 to failover from Node A to Node B regarldess of whether Node B has another unrealted QM already running there or not.
How long that takes depends on your exact setup and how many connections the QM needs to shutdown and the exact cause of the failover and etc etc etc _________________ Peter Potkay
Keep Calm and MQ On
You cannot post new topics in this forum You cannot reply to topics in this forum You cannot edit your posts in this forum You cannot delete your posts in this forum You cannot vote in polls in this forum