ASG
IBM
Zystems
Cressida
Icon
Netflexity
 
  MQSeries.net
Search  Search       Tech Exchange      Education      Certifications      Library      Info Center      SupportPacs      LinkedIn  Search  Search                                                                   FAQ  FAQ   Usergroups  Usergroups
 
Register  ::  Log in Log in to check your private messages
 
RSS Feed - WebSphere MQ Support RSS Feed - Message Broker Support

MQSeries.net Forum Index » Clustering » High Availability & Fail over

Post new topic  Reply to topic
 High Availability & Fail over « View previous topic :: View next topic » 
Author Message
rkford11
PostPosted: Wed Oct 24, 2007 8:08 am    Post subject: High Availability & Fail over Reply with quote

Partisan

Joined: 06 Jun 2004
Posts: 316

We are planning on implementing HA solution for our MQ environment to acheive failover of queue manager. Apart from reduced operating costs, does active-standby configuration buy us anything more over active-active configuration. Please suggest me the pros and cons of the two available configurations.

Thanks
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
jefflowrey
PostPosted: Wed Oct 24, 2007 12:25 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Grand Poobah

Joined: 16 Oct 2002
Posts: 19981

Active/Active is always implemented as paired-active/passive.
_________________
I am *not* the model of the modern major general.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
rkford11
PostPosted: Thu Oct 25, 2007 10:28 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

Partisan

Joined: 06 Jun 2004
Posts: 316

Thanks Jeff. In general, What would be the restart time difference between the two configurations. i.e time taken by passive system to take over failed system in active/passive config and time taken by active system to take over failed system in active/active config.

Thanks
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
PeterPotkay
PostPosted: Thu Oct 25, 2007 10:42 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

Poobah

Joined: 15 May 2001
Posts: 7722

Its the same thing. A QM can only run on one node. Its gonna take the same amount of time for QM1 to failover from Node A to Node B regarldess of whether Node B has another unrealted QM already running there or not.

How long that takes depends on your exact setup and how many connections the QM needs to shutdown and the exact cause of the failover and etc etc etc
_________________
Peter Potkay
Keep Calm and MQ On
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
senMQ
PostPosted: Sat Oct 27, 2007 5:59 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Acolyte

Joined: 14 Aug 2006
Posts: 66
Location: Palo Alto, CA

Support pac MC91 is a good place to start:
http://www-1.ibm.com/support/docview.wss?rs=171&uid=swg24011869
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail
Display posts from previous:   
Post new topic  Reply to topic Page 1 of 1

MQSeries.net Forum Index » Clustering » High Availability & Fail over
Jump to:  



You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot vote in polls in this forum
Protected by Anti-Spam ACP
 
 


Theme by Dustin Baccetti
Powered by phpBB © 2001, 2002 phpBB Group

Copyright © MQSeries.net. All rights reserved.