| Author |
Message
|
| wilsonjohn24 |
 Posted: Wed Sep 19, 2007 1:34 am Post subject: mqsiapplybaroverride Unix Equivalent |
 |
|
Voyager
Joined: 02 Feb 2007
Posts: 93
Location: Scotland
|
| Is there any workaround etc that allows you to override UDP's within a Unix environment? |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
| jefflowrey |
| Posted: Wed Sep 19, 2007 3:07 am Post subject: |
|
|
Grand Poobah
Joined: 16 Oct 2002
Posts: 19981
|
Why do you think mqsiapplybaroverride doesn't work on Unix?
To be more specific... I believe that mqsiapplybaroverride is a Toolkit command, and thus is only installed on machines that have the Toolkit on them. Right now, you can only install the Toolkit on Windows and Linux.
_________________
I am *not* the model of the modern major general. |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
| wilsonjohn24 |
| Posted: Wed Sep 19, 2007 3:44 am Post subject: |
|
|
Voyager
Joined: 02 Feb 2007
Posts: 93
Location: Scotland
|
Thats what I assumed- I was more intresting to see if any one had any work arounds etc.
Some sort of sh/tar/gzip workaround? |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
| mqmatt |
| Posted: Wed Sep 19, 2007 3:48 am Post subject: |
|
|
Grand Master
Joined: 04 Aug 2004
Posts: 1213
Location: Hursley, UK
|
Having mqsiapplybaroverride on runtime platforms is a very, very well known requirement to IBM.
Before the requirement gets resolved: because BAR files are just zips and deployment descriptors just XML, then as you imply, standard OS tools will do the trick fine.
-Matt |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
| wilsonjohn24 |
| Posted: Wed Sep 19, 2007 3:53 am Post subject: |
|
|
Voyager
Joined: 02 Feb 2007
Posts: 93
Location: Scotland
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
| Vitor |
| Posted: Wed Sep 19, 2007 4:04 am Post subject: |
|
|
Grand High Poobah
Joined: 11 Nov 2005
Posts: 26093
Location: Texas, USA
|
| mqmatt wrote: |
| Before the requirement gets resolved |
There's a similar requirement here.
On the understanding that only official IBM announcements are official, a fixed delivery date is a contradiction in terms and development priorities are subject to change at a moment's notice what would be your best guess of a resolution date? Next FP? Next release?
I'm just trying to avoid developing something and manhandling it through the test & release process if I can avoid it by hanging on for a few weeks / months & taking maintenance. 
_________________
Honesty is the best policy.
Insanity is the best defence. |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
|
|
