ASG
IBM
Zystems
Cressida
Icon
Netflexity
 
  MQSeries.net
Search  Search       Tech Exchange      Education      Certifications      Library      Info Center      SupportPacs      LinkedIn  Search  Search                                                                   FAQ  FAQ   Usergroups  Usergroups
 
Register  ::  Log in Log in to check your private messages
 
RSS Feed - WebSphere MQ Support RSS Feed - Message Broker Support

MQSeries.net Forum Index » General IBM MQ Support » Self signed and CA signed

Post new topic  Reply to topic
 Self signed and CA signed « View previous topic :: View next topic » 
Author Message
angka
PostPosted: Thu Jul 05, 2007 12:54 am    Post subject: Self signed and CA signed Reply with quote

Chevalier

Joined: 20 Sep 2005
Posts: 406

Hi,

What are the advantages to use CA signed cert compare to self signed?

I can only think of one which is cert renewal dun need the other connected system to be involved.

Thanks.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Mr Butcher
PostPosted: Thu Jul 05, 2007 1:33 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

Padawan

Joined: 23 May 2005
Posts: 1716

yes, but depending on the number of channels (or different dustomers) this can really be a big advantage.

on the one hand you have cost savings if you use self singed certificates, on the other hand you have less administration work if you use CA signed certs. whatever is best for you.

we agreed only to use CA signed certs with your MQ connections to customers because we do not want to import and re-new all the customers sel-sign-root-CAs certs.
_________________
Regards, Butcher
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
angka
PostPosted: Thu Jul 05, 2007 3:07 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

Chevalier

Joined: 20 Sep 2005
Posts: 406

Hi,

Any security issue?? I can't think of any..

Thanks
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Mr Butcher
PostPosted: Thu Jul 05, 2007 3:59 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

Padawan

Joined: 23 May 2005
Posts: 1716

i can. it depends how much security you set up at your end.

imagine i am your customer, and you accept my self-signed certificates, which means the public key of my signer ca (root ca)? is in your key storage.
now every certificate i sign with my CA is valid for you (theoretically).
lets assume i know other customers that connect to you. from the customers name it is not a big problem to find out about the distinguised name in the certificate they use to connect to you.

now i create my own certificate using their name, sign it, am i able to connect to you? i think so.

what happens if i am intruded and my root CA is stolen? Can someone do the same on his system and connect to you? i think so.

This does not mean things like this can not happen when you use "official" CAs, but - to get a signed certificate from them you have to give some official information about your company (in German its Handlesregister, which means you company must be registered somewhere), must have procura and so on. So the signed certificate from official CA is more reliable (and trustable), a self signed certificate can be anything.

A SSL guru may explain better (and of course will know more issues about security), but thats what i think from my basic SSL knowledge......
_________________
Regards, Butcher
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
marcin.kasinski
PostPosted: Thu Jul 05, 2007 5:17 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

Sentinel

Joined: 21 Dec 2004
Posts: 850
Location: Poland / Warsaw

I would say it this way:

DEV and test environment -> use self-signed cert.
PRD environment -> use standard PKI with CA infastructure.
_________________
Marcin
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Visit poster's website
angka
PostPosted: Thu Jul 05, 2007 11:52 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Chevalier

Joined: 20 Sep 2005
Posts: 406

lets assume i know other customers that connect to you. from the customers name it is not a big problem to find out about the distinguised name in the certificate they use to connect to you. now i create my own certificate using their name, sign it, am i able to connect to you? i think so.


But I shld be able overcome this by having 2 way authentication right?
I know the best practice is to have a CA signed but it cost money.. =)

Thanks all.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
marcin.kasinski
PostPosted: Fri Jul 06, 2007 12:05 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

Sentinel

Joined: 21 Dec 2004
Posts: 850
Location: Poland / Warsaw

angka wrote:


But I shld be able overcome this by having 2 way authentication right?


Right.

angka wrote:


I know the best practice is to have a CA signed but it cost money.. =)

Thanks all.


Please...
Dont save money on certs.
_________________
Marcin
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Visit poster's website
angka
PostPosted: Fri Jul 06, 2007 12:30 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

Chevalier

Joined: 20 Sep 2005
Posts: 406

Hi,

Thanks. I need to present to user and they will ask... hopefully they accept my reason...
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Display posts from previous:   
Post new topic  Reply to topic Page 1 of 1

MQSeries.net Forum Index » General IBM MQ Support » Self signed and CA signed
Jump to:  



You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot vote in polls in this forum
Protected by Anti-Spam ACP
 
 


Theme by Dustin Baccetti
Powered by phpBB © 2001, 2002 phpBB Group

Copyright © MQSeries.net. All rights reserved.