Author |
Message
|
ssoler |
Posted: Tue Jun 18, 2002 6:47 am Post subject: MQCONNX and COM+ |
|
|
Newbie
Joined: 12 Jun 2002 Posts: 6 Location: Spain
|
hi,
Please, I need you help. Is there any problem when MQCONNX is used with COM+ Services ?
in my case, some times the MQCONNX return is 2058.
version: MQ 5.2 and W2k.
Thank you. |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
mrlinux |
Posted: Fri Jun 21, 2002 5:05 am Post subject: |
|
|
 Grand Master
Joined: 14 Feb 2002 Posts: 1261 Location: Detroit,MI USA
|
You are not passing in the correct queue manager name. _________________ Jeff
IBM Certified Developer MQSeries
IBM Certified Specialist MQSeries
IBM Certified Solutions Expert MQSeries |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
ssoler |
Posted: Tue Jun 25, 2002 3:54 am Post subject: |
|
|
Newbie
Joined: 12 Jun 2002 Posts: 6 Location: Spain
|
The same componet, can to work perfecly under system W2k, but if you put it under COM+ Services, then return call MQCONNX is 2058.
(The queue manager name is the some)
Thank you for you help, |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
mrlinux |
Posted: Tue Jun 25, 2002 7:22 am Post subject: |
|
|
 Grand Master
Joined: 14 Feb 2002 Posts: 1261 Location: Detroit,MI USA
|
When under com services where is it getting the Queue Manager Name ??
The 2058 means you connected to the MQSeries Listener port and passed in a Queue manager name that did not match the queue manager for that listener process. _________________ Jeff
IBM Certified Developer MQSeries
IBM Certified Specialist MQSeries
IBM Certified Solutions Expert MQSeries |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
kirani |
Posted: Tue Jun 25, 2002 8:54 am Post subject: |
|
|
Jedi Knight
Joined: 05 Sep 2001 Posts: 3779 Location: Torrance, CA, USA
|
Probably your COM+ services is not able to get values set in MQSERVER variable. _________________ Kiran
IBM Cert. Solution Designer & System Administrator - WBIMB V5
IBM Cert. Solutions Expert - WMQI
IBM Cert. Specialist - WMQI, MQSeries
IBM Cert. Developer - MQSeries
|
|
Back to top |
|
 |
ssoler |
Posted: Wed Jul 03, 2002 3:26 am Post subject: |
|
|
Newbie
Joined: 12 Jun 2002 Posts: 6 Location: Spain
|
After installing the CSD04, the problem is solved.
Thank you,
bye. |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
|