| Author |
Message
|
| pcrparimi |
 Posted: Sat Apr 27, 2002 7:06 am Post subject: |
 |
|
Apprentice
Joined: 09 Oct 2001
Posts: 43
Location: NY
|
Hi,
Is there any limit on number of channels(sender & receiver) a MQ server can connect to?.
We have a central server(Tandem) wchich connects to around 50 severs and MQ is installed at all the servers. So is it okay if i have one QM at central server and having 100 channels(50 sender and 50 receiver).
Is there any issues related to performance?.
Thanks,
Poorna |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
| kolban |
| Posted: Sat Apr 27, 2002 2:00 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Grand Master
Joined: 22 May 2001
Posts: 1072
Location: Fort Worth, TX, USA
|
| With this number of channels, no problems ... the problems start over 1000 |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
| PeterPotkay |
| Posted: Sun Apr 28, 2002 6:19 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Poobah
Joined: 15 May 2001
Posts: 7722
|
Make sure your MAXCHANNELS and MAXACTIVECHANNELS parameters are set appropriatly. I think the default is 100.
_________________
Peter Potkay
Keep Calm and MQ On |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
| LuisFer |
| Posted: Sat Aug 17, 2002 1:21 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Partisan
Joined: 17 Aug 2002
Posts: 302
|
Hi:
Sorry for my bad english.
In my installation, in a Test env. (S74000 with 2 cpus, g06.10) we have connected 500 channels sdr/rcvr (total) without problems, sending every channel 1 msg/sec (no persistent) 2kb. |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
| jc_squire |
| Posted: Sun Aug 18, 2002 7:46 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Centurion
Joined: 14 Apr 2002
Posts: 105
Location: New Zealand
|
Depends on what system resources you have available. Obviously if all chls are running at the same time it will impact your system performance.
If you do have problems you can fine tune using MAXACTIVECHANNELS and also reduce your DISCINT on the chl def (bear in mind it uses resources to stop and start a chl).
Regards
_________________
J C Squire
IBM Certified Specialist - MQSeries |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
| LuisFer |
| Posted: Sun Aug 18, 2002 11:56 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Partisan
Joined: 17 Aug 2002
Posts: 302
|
| The two CPUS at 100% cte. |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
| vennela |
| Posted: Mon Aug 19, 2002 6:29 am Post subject: |
|
|
Jedi Knight
Joined: 11 Aug 2002
Posts: 4055
Location: Hyderabad, India
|
| Using the disconnect interval is a nice idea. I am against the idea of using a disconnect interval 0. |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
|
|
