| Author |
Message
|
| lotusphilo |
 Posted: Thu Dec 28, 2006 4:20 pm Post subject: RC 2080 Solutions |
 |
|
Voyager
Joined: 31 Mar 2004
Posts: 76
|
Can increasing the maximum lenght size on a queue resolve the problem resulting in a RC 2080, from an WMQ stanpoint. We are running WMQ V5.3, z/OS.
The reply message placed on the queue is so large, that it is being truncated. It says the following within the WMQ info-center in resolving the problem:
Programmer Response:
Supply a buffer that is at least as large as DATLEN, or specify GMATM if not all of the message data is required.
I'm not really clear if the 'buffer' indicated in the message is referring something on the applicatin side or an attribute for WMQ.
I see it's indicating a 'Programmer Response' but I was wondering are there measures I could take from an WMQ standpoint to resolve the issue.
Any help would be great, thanks. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
| KevinF23492 |
| Posted: Thu Dec 28, 2006 5:59 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Novice
Joined: 26 Dec 2006
Posts: 22
|
| The buffer in question is the application defined buffer. |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
| lotusphilo |
| Posted: Thu Dec 28, 2006 6:36 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Voyager
Joined: 31 Mar 2004
Posts: 76
|
Thanks for clarifying the buffer in question. So increasing buffer pools, storage class or MAXMSGL associated with the queue in question wont solve the issue? If not, will it have any impact on the problem at all?
So, increasing the application could resolve the issue? |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
| jefflowrey |
| Posted: Thu Dec 28, 2006 7:12 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Grand Poobah
Joined: 16 Oct 2002
Posts: 19981
|
This error message has to do with exactly and only one buffer.
And that is the buffer that is passed to the MQGET, by the application, for the purposes of retrieving the message data that is in the message on the queue.
Changing anything else will have no effect.
_________________
I am *not* the model of the modern major general. |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
| exerk |
| Posted: Fri Dec 29, 2006 12:39 am Post subject: |
|
|
Jedi Council
Joined: 02 Nov 2006
Posts: 6339
|
From your post is the assumption that the bufflen being allocated for the PUT is insufficient a correct assumption?
I ask as I was under the impression that unless MQGMO-ACCEPT-TRUNCATED-MSG was specified on the GET the get would fail.
_________________
It's puzzling, I don't think I've ever seen anything quite like this before...and it's hard to soar like an eagle when you're surrounded by turkeys. |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
| Vitor |
| Posted: Fri Dec 29, 2006 12:46 am Post subject: |
|
|
Grand High Poobah
Joined: 11 Nov 2005
Posts: 26093
Location: Texas, USA
|
| exerk wrote: |
| From your post is the assumption that the bufflen being allocated for the PUT is insufficient a correct assumption? |
| jefflowrey wrote: |
| that is the buffer that is passed to the MQGET |
_________________
Honesty is the best policy.
Insanity is the best defence. |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
| exerk |
| Posted: Fri Dec 29, 2006 12:49 am Post subject: |
|
|
Jedi Council
Joined: 02 Nov 2006
Posts: 6339
|
Doh! Sorry, too early in the morning and didn't read the first post properly 
_________________
It's puzzling, I don't think I've ever seen anything quite like this before...and it's hard to soar like an eagle when you're surrounded by turkeys. |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
| lotusphilo |
| Posted: Fri Dec 29, 2006 7:39 am Post subject: |
|
|
Voyager
Joined: 31 Mar 2004
Posts: 76
|
| Thanks for all the input, it is very helpful. |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
|
|
