| |
|
RSS Feed - WebSphere MQ Support
|
RSS Feed - Message Broker Support
|
  |
|
| Tandem Itanium WMQ 5.3 Can't get channels to start |
« View previous topic :: View next topic » |
| Author |
Message
|
| Zeppo53 |
 Posted: Thu Oct 05, 2006 3:54 am Post subject: Tandem Itanium WMQ 5.3 Can't get channels to start |
 |
|
Newbie
Joined: 05 Oct 2006
Posts: 1
|
Hi all,
We've installed 5.3 + efix4 + MQTNS update + patch2. Want to use $ZTCS instead of $ZTC0. Therefore I put "TransportName=$ZTCS" in qmproc.ini but it doesn't work. I've tried DEFINE's in PATHCOM as in 5.1 but it still tries to open a connection in $ZTC0 (which doesn't work).
We are running H06.07.01.
Any tips would be good. Thanks. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
| p53ekr |
| Posted: Mon Nov 27, 2006 6:55 am Post subject: Re: Tandem Itanium WMQ 5.3 Can't get channels to start |
|
|
Newbie
Joined: 27 Nov 2006
Posts: 1
|
Hi
Have you tried altering the server mqs-tcplis00 with "ARGLIST -t,TCP,-m,<qmqrname>,-g,$ZTCS" ?
Did you get your channels up with default $ztc0? We have same kind of problems (same OS version), we can't get channels up either. IBM is investigating the problem. |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
| SJ |
| Posted: Mon Nov 27, 2006 8:55 am Post subject: |
|
|
Newbie
Joined: 02 May 2003
Posts: 8
Location: US
|
Can you set the TCP process name on the channel definition as well on the Itanium?
ie CONNAME($ZTCS.<ip address>(<port>))
Regards Steve |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
| mclemens |
| Posted: Mon Nov 27, 2006 3:24 pm Post subject: TCP/IP process name in CONNAME doesn't work |
|
|
Newbie
Joined: 26 Jul 2006
Posts: 6
|
| If you put the TCP/IP process name as the first part of the CONNAME you get a gethostbyname error. I had to change all of my channel definitions to remove the TCP/IP process names from the CONNAMEs. I have had luck setting the TCP/IP process names using the TransportName variable in the qmproc.ini and also in the arglist for the MQS-TCPLIS00 server class. Here's an example - alter mqs-tcplis00,arglist -t,tcp,-m,MQUEMGR,-g,$ZB214,-p,1421. |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
| hankknowles |
| Posted: Tue Nov 28, 2006 4:51 am Post subject: |
|
|
Centurion
Joined: 18 Aug 2003
Posts: 114
|
And as long as you are modifying the PATHWAY server examine the others and distribute the CPU workload away from CPU 0 and 1. The IBM folk seem hung up on 0 and 1 !
HTH |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
|
|
|
| |
|
Page 1 of 1 |
|
You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot vote in polls in this forum
|
|
|
|
