| Author |
Message
|
| ferfi |
 Posted: Wed Oct 25, 2006 7:24 am Post subject: undocumented parameter -f for endmqlsr |
 |
|
Newbie
Joined: 19 Oct 2006
Posts: 5
|
Hi all,
does anybody know what this parameter is for? Maybe a kind of force end command?
Regards
Ralph |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
| Nigelg |
| Posted: Thu Oct 26, 2006 12:46 am Post subject: |
|
|
Grand Master
Joined: 02 Aug 2004
Posts: 1046
|
This parameter ends the listener while the qmgr is running.
Note that if you use it and have a problem, IBM will not support you.
_________________
MQSeries.net helps those who help themselves.. |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
| ferfi |
| Posted: Thu Oct 26, 2006 4:51 am Post subject: |
|
|
Newbie
Joined: 19 Oct 2006
Posts: 5
|
Hi,
with Version 6 it is possible to stop the listener while the qmgr is running without using -f !
So it must be another functionality....
Regards
Ralph |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
| Nigelg |
| Posted: Fri Oct 27, 2006 12:29 am Post subject: |
|
|
Grand Master
Joined: 02 Aug 2004
Posts: 1046
|
You asked, I answered, now you don't believe it. If you are so clver, sort it out yourself.
It will be a long time before I answer another one of your questions.
_________________
MQSeries.net helps those who help themselves.. |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
| ferfi |
| Posted: Fri Oct 27, 2006 6:05 am Post subject: |
|
|
Newbie
Joined: 19 Oct 2006
Posts: 5
|
Hi Nigelg,
I'm sorry if I offend you! I'm not a native speaker and it wasn't my intent to insult you.
Please believe me, I tested stopping the listener without -f while the qmgr is still running, before I send you my answer. And it worked. This is a fact.
This is what I found on the IBM support pages:
==============================================
IY84742: ENDMQLSR BEHAVIOUR IN WEBSPHERE MQ 6.0
APAR status
Closed as documentation error.
Error description
In WMQ 6.0, endmqlsr command stops the listener even though
queue manager processes are still alive. This behaviour is
different from WMQ V5.3, where endmqlsr fails if the queue
manager is running.
==============================================
So it should be another functionality with this parameter.
Again, I never will offend you!
Kind regards
Ralph |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
| HubertKleinmanns |
| Posted: Mon Oct 30, 2006 11:41 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Shaman
Joined: 24 Feb 2004
Posts: 732
Location: Germany
|
ferfi,
the option -f was never official and not documented. So IBM may use this option, remove it in newer version or ignore it ...
-f means force and it does not matter, if the behaviour changed from MQv5.3 to MQv6. It seems, that -f is now default and the option itself obsolet.
If you need a more official answer, raise a PMR at IBM and ask this question again.
_________________
Regards
Hubert |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
| jefflowrey |
| Posted: Tue Oct 31, 2006 2:26 am Post subject: |
|
|
Grand Poobah
Joined: 16 Oct 2002
Posts: 19981
|
I doubt that a PMR will give a different answer than Nigelg did.
I doubt there is a different answer.
_________________
I am *not* the model of the modern major general. |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
|
|
