| |
|
RSS Feed - WebSphere MQ Support
|
RSS Feed - Message Broker Support
|
  |
|
| Using same queue manager names |
« View previous topic :: View next topic » |
| Author |
Message
|
| cstubbs |
 Posted: Thu May 16, 2002 6:47 am Post subject: Using same queue manager names |
 |
|
Newbie
Joined: 16 May 2002
Posts: 9
Location: San Antonio
|
There are some people at my company who want me to change the queue manager names on all of the websphere boxes to be the same name. The names are currently based on the server where it resides. For example, if the server name is webprod1, the queue manager name is WEBP01P1. If there were two queue managers on this box, its name would be WEBP01P2. We are very comfortable with our naming standards. The xmitqs and channels also are named with the same standards.
What problems could arise if the same qmgr name is used on multiple servers?
I can think of a few: clustering won't support it, it would be harder for problem determination.
What else? |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
| mrlinux |
| Posted: Thu May 16, 2002 7:30 am Post subject: |
|
|
Grand Master
Joined: 14 Feb 2002
Posts: 1261
Location: Detroit,MI USA
|
Well if you are using request/reply messages how are you going to indicate which machine to reply to ????
_________________
Jeff
IBM Certified Developer MQSeries
IBM Certified Specialist MQSeries
IBM Certified Solutions Expert MQSeries |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
| kolban |
| Posted: Thu May 16, 2002 8:17 am Post subject: |
|
|
Grand Master
Joined: 22 May 2001
Posts: 1072
Location: Fort Worth, TX, USA
|
o You won't be able to communicate from one queue manager to another
o You won't be able to communicate from one queue manager to another
o You won't be able to communicate from one queue manager to another
Its a really bad idea.
If the thinking behind the constant naming is to eliminate the name of the queue manager in the code or definitions, then make the queue manager on each machine the default queue manager and then you can specify "" as a queue manager name in the apps and the default queue manager will be used.
Perhaps you can let us know why the names should be made the same? What is the driving force behind it? |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
|
|
|
| |
|
Page 1 of 1 |
|
You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot vote in polls in this forum
|
|
|
|
