ASG
IBM
Zystems
Cressida
Icon
Netflexity
 
  MQSeries.net
Search  Search       Tech Exchange      Education      Certifications      Library      Info Center      SupportPacs      LinkedIn  Search  Search                                                                   FAQ  FAQ   Usergroups  Usergroups
 
Register  ::  Log in Log in to check your private messages
 
RSS Feed - WebSphere MQ Support RSS Feed - Message Broker Support

MQSeries.net Forum Index » WebSphere Message Broker (ACE) Support » Data driven flows in Websphere Message Broker (version 6)

Post new topic  Reply to topic
 Data driven flows in Websphere Message Broker (version 6) « View previous topic :: View next topic » 
Author Message
jstorni
PostPosted: Tue Jul 11, 2006 3:09 pm    Post subject: Data driven flows in Websphere Message Broker (version 6) Reply with quote

Novice

Joined: 03 Feb 2006
Posts: 10

Hi all,
We have to implement 400+ use cases for request/response to external systems. The use cases are splitted 60/40 in two external systems. Both requires transformations (XML->something). All the use cases related to a given external system, share the same message format (variable field list, with delimiters).
In addition to these use cases, we have to implement 200+ use cases of business logic.

Currently we have a component that creates the target message by accesing a repository that contains the message description of each use case. So, the only requirement for transformation is the creation of a XSLT file for field mapping definition only.

The questions:

1) Do you have experience in an implementation with Message Broker 6, with 600+ flows ?

2) We are analizing to create two generic "data driven" flows, that handle the requests by identifying the service in runtime and loading the required layout data to create both request or response messages. With this approach, we have to implement just 2 (but a bit complex) flows instead of 400+, and develop 800+ XSLT templates for field mapping. In addition, the XSLT templates can be automatically created (at least the skeleton), because we have a complete inventory of the input and output fields. What do you think ? Is this approach aligned with the common patterns used with IBM Message Broker ?

3) In relation to the previous: do you think if implementing the 400+ integration use cases with DataStage TX extender for IBM Message Broker 6, building manually the type tree and the field mapping both for request and response (800+ type tree and 800+ mapping definition), is a better solution ?

Many thanks !
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
shrek
PostPosted: Wed Jul 12, 2006 6:50 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

Acolyte

Joined: 19 Feb 2005
Posts: 61
Location: Gudivada,India

You may not need 400+ if you implement subflows & common esql modules. Have you thought abt it. Thanks.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
jstorni
PostPosted: Wed Jul 12, 2006 9:16 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

Novice

Joined: 03 Feb 2006
Posts: 10

Thanks for your response.

This is referred in point 2.
The question is about the common patterns used for developing applications with Message Broker, and specially with a lot of use cases that requires the same transformation logic.


Again, many thanks.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Display posts from previous:   
Post new topic  Reply to topic Page 1 of 1

MQSeries.net Forum Index » WebSphere Message Broker (ACE) Support » Data driven flows in Websphere Message Broker (version 6)
Jump to:  



You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot vote in polls in this forum
Protected by Anti-Spam ACP
 
 


Theme by Dustin Baccetti
Powered by phpBB © 2001, 2002 phpBB Group

Copyright © MQSeries.net. All rights reserved.