ASG
IBM
Zystems
Cressida
Icon
Netflexity
 
  MQSeries.net
Search  Search       Tech Exchange      Education      Certifications      Library      Info Center      SupportPacs      LinkedIn  Search  Search                                                                   FAQ  FAQ   Usergroups  Usergroups
 
Register  ::  Log in Log in to check your private messages
 
RSS Feed - WebSphere MQ Support RSS Feed - Message Broker Support

MQSeries.net Forum Index » Workflow Engines - IBM MQ Workflow & Business Process Choreographer » One question about mq workflow!

Post new topic  Reply to topic
 One question about mq workflow! « View previous topic :: View next topic » 
Author Message
tyctlnc
PostPosted: Mon May 15, 2006 5:21 am    Post subject: One question about mq workflow! Reply with quote

Novice

Joined: 27 Apr 2006
Posts: 15

In my process, i have 2 activites, the first is A, and the second is B.
I have 2 roles, one is C and another is D. D has only one person.
All user in role C must implement A, then only user in D can implement B.
The user in D implements B when all user in C is done his work.
How can i di this? any body gives me an idiea? thanks a lot!
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
jmac
PostPosted: Mon May 15, 2006 6:30 am    Post subject: Re: One question about mq workflow! Reply with quote

Jedi Knight

Joined: 27 Jun 2001
Posts: 3081
Location: EmeriCon, LLC

tyctlnc wrote:
All user in role C must implement A, then only user in D can implement B.


Role C contains U1, U2, U3. Are you saying that all of these users must work Activity A? If so, while this can be done it is non-trivial, and I would suggest that you get help from someone well versed in MQWF.
_________________
John McDonald
RETIRED
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail Visit poster's website AIM Address Yahoo Messenger MSN Messenger
anveshita
PostPosted: Tue May 16, 2006 7:26 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

Master

Joined: 27 Sep 2004
Posts: 254
Location: Jambudweepam

I think I would need more information.
let us say u1, u2, u3 are under role C.
let us say u4 is under role D.

Do you want to carry the information processed by u1,u2,u3 to u4?

Do you want u1, u2, u3 to process the activity in parallel or
does the processing by u1 affect the processing of u2?

I agree with John, it is not trivial. One needs to have a clear picture of the
business before start modelling.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
tyctlnc
PostPosted: Sat May 20, 2006 8:42 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

Novice

Joined: 27 Apr 2006
Posts: 15

In my process, i want u4 to collect information from u1,u2,u3, then excution the active.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
sarasu
PostPosted: Wed May 24, 2006 6:13 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

Master

Joined: 02 Feb 2006
Posts: 229

In workflow, if the process is continuing from u1 to u2 and to u3, after that the result will go to u4? or you cannot make all the 3 activities with u1, u2 and u3 in parallel and then to u4. It depends on the conditions you check before starting the activity u4. Please let us know more clearly.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
sarasu
PostPosted: Wed May 24, 2006 6:16 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

Master

Joined: 02 Feb 2006
Posts: 229

You can also do in the Statrt Tab of the Activity properties of u4 user "All incomming "All incomming connectors are true" and then try it out.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Display posts from previous:   
Post new topic  Reply to topic Page 1 of 1

MQSeries.net Forum Index » Workflow Engines - IBM MQ Workflow & Business Process Choreographer » One question about mq workflow!
Jump to:  



You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot vote in polls in this forum
Protected by Anti-Spam ACP
 
 


Theme by Dustin Baccetti
Powered by phpBB © 2001, 2002 phpBB Group

Copyright © MQSeries.net. All rights reserved.