ASG
IBM
Zystems
Cressida
Icon
Netflexity
 
  MQSeries.net
Search  Search       Tech Exchange      Education      Certifications      Library      Info Center      SupportPacs      LinkedIn  Search  Search                                                                   FAQ  FAQ   Usergroups  Usergroups
 
Register  ::  Log in Log in to check your private messages
 
RSS Feed - WebSphere MQ Support RSS Feed - Message Broker Support

MQSeries.net Forum Index » Clustering » Shared-Nothing cluster

Post new topic  Reply to topic
 Shared-Nothing cluster « View previous topic :: View next topic » 
Author Message
kinf1
PostPosted: Mon May 08, 2006 10:36 pm    Post subject: Shared-Nothing cluster Reply with quote

Novice

Joined: 15 Mar 2006
Posts: 15

I read that 'A shared-nothing cluster does not provide load balancing'.
MQ cluster a shared-nothing cluster but it does provide load balancing capabilities, does'nt it?
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Nigelg
PostPosted: Mon May 08, 2006 11:54 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Grand Master

Joined: 02 Aug 2004
Posts: 1046

Sharing nothing
Is like sharing
Everything
with everybody

haiku-like (17 syllables), but probably not the right number of syllables in each line.

And about as cryptic as the question.

The answer is YES
If it pleases you
or maybe NO
otherwise
_________________
MQSeries.net helps those who help themselves..
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
kinf1
PostPosted: Tue May 09, 2006 12:53 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

Novice

Joined: 15 Mar 2006
Posts: 15

Sorry about being vague.

Here is what i read in an article:
'A shared-nothing cluster (such as Microsoft’s Cluster Server) does not share any components, but usually involves replication of data (in a timely manner) that can be used by a hot standby system/application. In
this scenario, clustering provides fail-over capabilities, but not load-balancing.'

It also says that MQ clustering works on this concept of shared-nothing cluster.

My doubt is : MQ clustering does provide load balancing.So how does this comply with the definition of a shared-nothing cluster?

Hope this is still not cryptic.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
jefflowrey
PostPosted: Tue May 09, 2006 4:41 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

Grand Poobah

Joined: 16 Oct 2002
Posts: 19981

Maybe you read wrong. Maybe what you read is wrong.

MQ Clustering DOES provide load-balancing and DOES NOT provide failover capabilities (by any reasonable definition of "failover").
_________________
I am *not* the model of the modern major general.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
wschutz
PostPosted: Tue May 09, 2006 5:50 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

Jedi Knight

Joined: 02 Jun 2005
Posts: 3316
Location: IBM (retired)

Of course, V6 provides CLWLPRTY:
http://publib.boulder.ibm.com/infocenter/wmqv6/v6r0/index.jsp?topic=/com.ibm.mq.csqzah.doc/c1.htm
which does provide a "failover" capability... but whether you really consider it failover is best left for a "rum debate".
_________________
-wayne
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail AIM Address
Display posts from previous:   
Post new topic  Reply to topic Page 1 of 1

MQSeries.net Forum Index » Clustering » Shared-Nothing cluster
Jump to:  



You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot vote in polls in this forum
Protected by Anti-Spam ACP
 
 


Theme by Dustin Baccetti
Powered by phpBB © 2001, 2002 phpBB Group

Copyright © MQSeries.net. All rights reserved.