| Author |
Message
|
| raghubegur |
 Posted: Thu Apr 27, 2006 1:25 pm Post subject: Same Aggregate Name in multiple execution groups |
 |
|
Apprentice
Joined: 15 Jul 2002
Posts: 45
|
Hi,
I have one fan-out flow and one fan-in flow.
The fan-out flow is a webservice flow receiving http requests.
Wiring is done per documentation for WBIMB 6.0
Aggregation timeout is set to 10 seconds.
Unknown message timeout is set to 3 seconds.
Per documentation, we can have only one occurrence of a aggregation name in the broker context.
I deployed my aggregation flows to 2 execution groups. EXG1 and EXG2.
I was expecting undetermined / unexpected behaviour since both the execution groups have nearly identical message flows - particularly the aggregation name. The only differences are : input URL in the fan-out flow, and the queue on which the fan-in flow listens.
Things are working fine so far - Both normal processing and TimeOut processing. I tested it sending over 500 messages to each of these execution groups parallelly.
Why is that I do not see problems as predicted by broker documentation ?
Is it guaranteed to behave this way all through ?
_________________
Cheers
Raghu |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
| jefflowrey |
| Posted: Thu Apr 27, 2006 1:36 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Grand Poobah
Joined: 16 Oct 2002
Posts: 19981
|
Are you overriding the URL and Input Queues in the BAR file, or did you duplicate the flow and change them there?
_________________
I am *not* the model of the modern major general. |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
| raghubegur |
| Posted: Thu Apr 27, 2006 1:47 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Apprentice
Joined: 15 Jul 2002
Posts: 45
|
I am over riding the url and the input queue on the bar file.
_________________
Cheers
Raghu |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
| raghubegur |
| Posted: Thu Apr 27, 2006 1:49 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Apprentice
Joined: 15 Jul 2002
Posts: 45
|
To clarify, I created 2 bar files. First bar file had the default url and the queue name. On the second bar file I over rode the url and queue name
_________________
Cheers
Raghu |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
| jefflowrey |
| Posted: Thu Apr 27, 2006 2:09 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Grand Poobah
Joined: 16 Oct 2002
Posts: 19981
|
Still, it is the same message flow because it has the same unique id.
_________________
I am *not* the model of the modern major general. |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
| raghubegur |
| Posted: Thu Apr 27, 2006 2:45 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Apprentice
Joined: 15 Jul 2002
Posts: 45
|
Copying the message flows and creating a new bar file would mean the message flow Id would be different. May be that is the scenario to which broker documentation is referring to. I will try that. Thanks.
_________________
Cheers
Raghu |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
|
|
