|
RSS Feed - WebSphere MQ Support
|
RSS Feed - Message Broker Support
|
 |
|
XMS C/C++: Performance versus plain JMS |
« View previous topic :: View next topic » |
Author |
Message
|
PeterPotkay |
Posted: Fri Feb 17, 2006 11:40 am Post subject: XMS C/C++: Performance versus plain JMS |
|
|
 Poobah
Joined: 15 May 2001 Posts: 7722
|
|
Back to top |
|
 |
saketr |
Posted: Fri Feb 17, 2006 12:23 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Apprentice
Joined: 08 Feb 2006 Posts: 41
|
Peter,
As you are well aware, System performance and scalability are tricky subjects. We haven't collected formal performance numbers that could be publicly posted.
There are many dimensions in the comparison you have suggested - runtime technology vs native execution, choice of runtime technology, JIT/GC options, resource utilization vs t/put (resource = cpu | memory | network | disk footprint), message type, message size, connection mode, think time, messaging scenario, choice of hardware, library versions, features being benchmarked (selection | sync/async | persistence | admin objects etc.) etc. I would be very interested to hear about your observations for any datapoints chosen from above dimensions. |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
PeterPotkay |
Posted: Fri Feb 17, 2006 12:32 pm Post subject: |
|
|
 Poobah
Joined: 15 May 2001 Posts: 7722
|
Well, I think when asking about comparisions in performance, I assume all other variables are the same as much as possible.
That's always a knock on JMS, on how slow it is. XMS being C based should be a lot faster, no? _________________ Peter Potkay
Keep Calm and MQ On |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
saketr |
Posted: Fri Feb 17, 2006 12:34 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Apprentice
Joined: 08 Feb 2006 Posts: 41
|
That's a fair assumption, but perhaps not always true. You gotta try it out and tell me what you think!  |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
|
|
 |
|
Page 1 of 1 |
|
You cannot post new topics in this forum You cannot reply to topics in this forum You cannot edit your posts in this forum You cannot delete your posts in this forum You cannot vote in polls in this forum
|
|
|
|