| Author |
Message
|
| Guava72 |
 Posted: Sat Jan 28, 2006 12:02 pm Post subject: dspmq shows (%3) instead of QM name |
 |
|
Apprentice
Joined: 06 Jun 2003
Posts: 46
Location: Champaign, IL
|
Hi, I'm trying to "fix" an WMQ 5.3 (no CSD) installation on Solaris 8.
It seems the SA's monkeyed around with the /usr/lib/locale directory and wiped out the amq.cat file. I had them copy it from another Solaris 8 server with the same level of WMQ. Now dspmq shows the QM statuses, but not the QM names and the tab (spaces):
| Code: |
-bash-3.00$ dspmq
QMNAME(%3)%4STATUS(Ended unexpectedly)
QMNAME(%3)%4STATUS(Ended normally)
QMNAME(%3)%4STATUS(Ended normally)
QMNAME(%3)%4STATUS(Ended unexpectedly)
QMNAME(%3)%4STATUS(Ended immediately)
QMNAME(%3)%4STATUS(Ended unexpectedly)
QMNAME(%3)%4STATUS(Ended unexpectedly)
QMNAME(%3)%4STATUS(Ended unexpectedly)
QMNAME(%3)%4STATUS(Ended immediately)
QMNAME(%3)%4STATUS(Ended immediately)
QMNAME(%3)%4STATUS(Ended immediately)
QMNAME(%3)%4STATUS(Running)
QMNAME(%3)%4STATUS(Ended immediately)
-bash-3.00$
|
I'd rather just fix this installation instead of re-installing. I searched this forum but no luck. Any ideas on what is still missing? THanks in advance!!
==Ryan |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
| PeterPotkay |
| Posted: Sat Jan 28, 2006 1:09 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Poobah
Joined: 15 May 2001
Posts: 7722
|
Just grasping at straws here. If I saw this I would first look to see if /var/mqm/mqs.ini still exists. What are its contents?
By the way, why don't you apply a CSD? Its all the way up to CSD12 now.
_________________
Peter Potkay
Keep Calm and MQ On |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
| Guava72 |
| Posted: Sat Jan 28, 2006 1:18 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Apprentice
Joined: 06 Jun 2003
Posts: 46
Location: Champaign, IL
|
Hi Peter,
/var/mqm/mqs.ini still exists, and in fact got updated when I created a new QM this morning to test it. So it seems to be working OK from a very basic standpoint. I can also stop/start QM's with no FDC's or errors.
As far as the CSD goes, yes we are a little behind, but even our Production servers are only at CSD05. So I could apply that but for anything higher, I'd need to recommend it, and it would have to be tested, etc. etc. Which we could do but so far our Production is working fine. I work at a mid-to-large-size company with tons of procedures in place... This is good and bad. |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
| Philip Morten |
| Posted: Mon Jan 30, 2006 3:05 am Post subject: |
|
|
Master
Joined: 07 Mar 2002
Posts: 230
Location: Hursley Park
|
You could try using pkgchk mqm to identify any discrepancies between the files on the machine and what was installed.
_________________
Philip Morten
The postings on this site are my own and do not necessarily represent IBM's positions, strategies or opinions. |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
| csmith28 |
| Posted: Mon Jan 30, 2006 4:05 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Grand Master
Joined: 15 Jul 2003
Posts: 1196
Location: Arizona
|
| Philip Morten wrote: |
| You could try using pkgchk mqm to identify any discrepancies between the files on the machine and what was installed. |
just out of curiosity, what happens when you run the following?
| Code: |
| # echo "dis qmgr" | runmqsc QMGRNAME | grep QMNAME |
what is the output?
_________________
Yes, I am an agent of Satan but my duties are largely ceremonial. |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
| Guava72 |
| Posted: Fri Feb 03, 2006 8:57 am Post subject: |
|
|
Apprentice
Joined: 06 Jun 2003
Posts: 46
Location: Champaign, IL
|
Thanks for the suggestions...I don't have privelege to properly run pkgchk command, but your other commands worked.
[/code]
-bash-3.00$ echo "dis qmgr" | runmqsc WEB2005 | grep QMNAME
COMMANDQ(SYSTEM.ADMIN.COMMAND.QUEUE) QMNAME(WEB2005)
-bash-3.00$
| Code: |
I just discovered that another team asked our UNIX team to upgrade this box from Solaris 8 to Solaris 10 and didn't put us in the loop. And apparently there are some differences between Solaris 8 and 10 which affect WMQ. So do we need to remove this installation and install WMQ 5.3 for Solaris 10? Is there such a thing? |
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
| PeterPotkay |
| Posted: Fri Feb 03, 2006 9:21 am Post subject: |
|
|
Poobah
Joined: 15 May 2001
Posts: 7722
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
| Guava72 |
| Posted: Fri Feb 03, 2006 9:52 am Post subject: |
|
|
Apprentice
Joined: 06 Jun 2003
Posts: 46
Location: Champaign, IL
|
| thanks peter. that's good to know. probably when they did the OS upgrade, they didn't bring back over all of the files. I had them recopy amq.cat and that allowed me to see the statuses, but apparently there are some other files that have some MQ system variables. This is a Development box, so if I can't figure it out soon we can probably just re-install. |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
| HubertKleinmanns |
| Posted: Mon Feb 06, 2006 10:49 am Post subject: |
|
|
Shaman
Joined: 24 Feb 2004
Posts: 732
Location: Germany
|
With Solaris 10 you may have a feature called "zoning". Ask you Solaris guys for more information. One effect I know is, that you may have no local /etc/system but a global one instead - which defines attributes for several zones (and may be overwritten by single zones).
Do you use "zoning"?
_________________
Regards
Hubert |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
|
|
